FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

408 turbo cam recommendation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 20, 2008 | 07:47 PM
  #11  
Hawk179's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,002
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Rick_Vor


LOL! I was trying to be prudent and see what others were running before I crawled to the Synergy alter and ask the phophet for his divine answer!

Well Rick, since you stepped up, my question for you was a two parter:

1)Do I stick with the flattops and limit the boost to 14-15lbs (if that is do-able on CA 91 octane and a lot of Meth) or do I swap out the flattops for some dish pistons and kick it up to 17-18lbs. I am leaning on keeping the flattops (obviously they are aleady installed and ready to go) to help with mileage and everyday driveabiblity but is that going to put a limit on the overall potential of the system.

2) That said, a cam recomendation that will take advantage of the extra displacement and increase my bottem end torque whilr not choking off the top end charge.

Rick
Again, I know nothing about your motor still. Flat tops could put you at 12:1 right now. You need to see what piston it is, then meassure the deck on it. Then we can see what head you are using.

Having stellar bottom end with no loss in top wont happen. You can keep a lot of it, but this world aint perfect.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2008 | 07:51 PM
  #12  
Rick_Vor's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
From: Lafayette, CA
Default

Specs on the Shortblock:

408 short block: 6.0 iron block .030 over, eagle crank and rods, diamond -2 CC pistons, total seal rings, clevite rod and main bearings, ARP main studs, ARP head studs, hex adjust single chain, ported LS6 oil pump

It was freshened up with new bearings and rinks last May and has about 500 miles on it. The previous owner in building a 427 hence the sale.

I'm going to use a set of stock 317's on it. I actually have a set of LS3's and a truck intake assembly but I don't really have the funds to keep them and put in the 408. At least for the moment... Seeing what Rick and others have done with just 317's, I'm not sure it is worth the expense.

Rick
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2008 | 07:58 PM
  #13  
Hawk179's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,002
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Rick_Vor
Specs on the Shortblock:

408 short block: 6.0 iron block .030 over, eagle crank and rods, diamond -2 CC pistons, total seal rings, clevite rod and main bearings, ARP main studs, ARP head studs, hex adjust single chain, ported LS6 oil pump

It was freshened up with new bearings and rinks last May and has about 500 miles on it. The previous owner in building a 427 hence the sale.

I'm going to use a set of stock 317's on it. I actually have a set of LS3's and a truck intake assembly but I don't really have the funds to keep them and put in the 408. At least for the moment... Seeing what Rick and others have done with just 317's, I'm not sure it is worth the expense.

Rick

Its not worth keeping the LS3's over the 317's. Better response from the 317's.

Ok, I still dont know your pistons. Could be a few different sets from diamond. You need to know the compression height and what they are out of deck. From there we can know for sure. Sounds like you might be in the 10.0 range which I would try and stay away from if you are building a turbo motor.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2008 | 08:20 PM
  #14  
Rick_Vor's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
From: Lafayette, CA
Default

I already have a buyer for the LS3's so they are pretty much out of the equation.

I won't get the shortblock for a week or two so I'll ask the owner if he can get me the piston part number and the installed deck height.

Thanks, Rick
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2008 | 10:17 PM
  #15  
fish5225's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default

I don't know how difference between turbo and TVS but we made huge torque on a forged 408 at only 5.5lbs of boost with a 226-238, 601 601, 114. and a TVS 1900. I posted some dyno graphs about a month ago. Again we were running 9.1 compression with ported LS2 heads. The engine runs great.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2008 | 07:28 AM
  #16  
zippy's Avatar
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 3
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

I would think you'd want something around a 224/218 on a 114 for your goal assuming your compression is actually around 10:1. A 408 with 10:1 compression and 12psi should be all the power you're going to need.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2008 | 11:06 AM
  #17  
Hawk179's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,002
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by zippy
I would think you'd want something around a 224/218 on a 114 for your goal assuming your compression is actually around 10:1. A 408 with 10:1 compression and 12psi should be all the power you're going to need.
I would widen that lobe center a lot more than that for this 408. Make sure the motor has more vacuum because his gas economy is key in this build. Plus if its 10:1, you don't want that advance on the intake cycle.

R
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2008 | 01:53 PM
  #18  
zippy's Avatar
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 3
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

I thought about that later after I typed it. A 116 would probably be closer to his stock driving type feel and desire. I see the fuel milage thing alot and it is something that should be important. Why build a bad *** truck and then not drive it because it's too hard on gas. I see many build a truck saying that they don't care about milage then later say that they hardly drive it because gas price it too high...
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2008 | 12:48 AM
  #19  
Hawk179's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,002
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by zippy
I thought about that later after I typed it. A 116 would probably be closer to his stock driving type feel and desire. I see the fuel milage thing alot and it is something that should be important. Why build a bad *** truck and then not drive it because it's too hard on gas. I see many build a truck saying that they don't care about milage then later say that they hardly drive it because gas price it too high...

Thats the best part about boost. Everyone forgets that they cam build a very simple and well balanced motor, and still make good power from boost. That why a lot of turbo vehicles are in the OEM world versus supercharged ones.

I used a 230/227 cam on marks 438, and I still thought I could of gone smaller.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2008 | 01:10 AM
  #20  
thunder550's Avatar
High on diesel fumes
iTrader: (70)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,658
Likes: 3
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

On my setup, I'm running a 220/222-580/580-114+1 cam and have been very happy with it. I'm about 9.4:1 compression. Richard @ WCCH spec'ed the cam for me and it has worked very well.

On my original 408 I ran a 235/239-600/580-114+4 cam and I thought it was way too big. I didn't like it at all.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:02 AM.