Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Graphs | Power Comparisons | Dyno Truck List

Trick Turbo on Dyno

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 5, 2008 | 09:28 PM
  #21  
JJ_TURBO's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Truck Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
From: South Texas
Default

My truck weights 4280lbs without driver and I don't know what kind of dyno it was, Im going back with a usb to save the dyno sheet and I'll ask. I do have a bad vibration on the rear wheels cause of some spacers I put on but who knows? And yeah the weather was pretty hot that day IAT were from 105 to 109 during the pull.
Reply
Old May 5, 2008 | 09:44 PM
  #22  
JJ_TURBO's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Truck Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
From: South Texas
Default

Here is the video of the second run, you can see how bad the vibration is.

Reply
Old May 5, 2008 | 11:32 PM
  #23  
WJ MARK's Avatar
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,093
Likes: 0
From: colorado above 6000 ft.
Default

Who cares about the numbers, Your Trucks runs good!! It definately makes a statement at the track. Good job!
Reply
Old May 6, 2008 | 10:13 AM
  #24  
ap2002's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,411
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by stock48
Hear check this out, it seems to be fairly accurate.
http://www.race-cars.net/calculators/et_calculator.html
has anyone else tried this calcuator to be accurate? mine shows 442rwhp n/a and 550rwhp on the juice?

i think its way off??

by the way JJ, I would worry about it, the numbers at the track is what counts!!
Reply
Old May 7, 2008 | 04:51 PM
  #25  
stock48's Avatar
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 5
From: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by ap2002
has anyone else tried this calcuator to be accurate? mine shows 442rwhp n/a and 550rwhp on the juice?

i think its way off??

by the way JJ, I would worry about it, the numbers at the track is what counts!!
The conditions where you ran can make a big difference. I know down there in TX the air can get way below sealevel in the winter. But in summer it get's awful. a Da of -1500' vs a +2500DA can make over a half second difference in ET, and 3~5 mph. Bring your truck up hear to denver (8000')DA you will be high 13's on motor, and bairly dip into the 12's on N2o, unless you up the shot.
Reply
Old May 7, 2008 | 08:49 PM
  #26  
ZO6Ted's Avatar
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,310
Likes: 266
From: Arlington, TX
Default

JJ, your "track dyno" speaks for itself.
Reply
Old May 8, 2008 | 12:31 AM
  #27  
stock48's Avatar
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 5
From: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by ZO6Ted
JJ, your "track dyno" speaks for itself.
Yes It does! Track numbers mean everything, and dyno numbers are just for bragging. Not that 516HP is low, I just think he has more than that. Probably just a conservative dyno.
Reply
Old May 8, 2008 | 04:51 PM
  #28  
8ALTNG's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,647
Likes: 1
From: Methuen, MA
Default

**** dyno numbers. You ran 10.90's with the truck. That is all that matters. You can make over 1000rwhp and still not get into the 9's or make low 700's and run into the 9's. the proof is in the time slip, not in the dyno sheet. Sick truck man. Keep chipping away at those high 10's/
Reply
Old May 8, 2008 | 07:00 PM
  #29  
JJ_TURBO's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Truck Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
From: South Texas
Default

Thanks guys, I do know it still has better et even with this number I just need to try it more times on the track with better launches, I'll post up when I do.
Reply
Old May 9, 2008 | 01:47 AM
  #30  
stock48's Avatar
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 5
From: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by JJ_TURBO
Thanks guys, I do know it still has better et even with this number I just need to try it more times on the track with better launches, I'll post up when I do.
124MPH is enough MPH for 10.50's if you can get out of the hole hard enough.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:10 PM.