Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Graphs | Power Comparisons | Dyno Truck List

got back from the dyno

Old Oct 26, 2009 | 01:39 PM
  #11  
1dirtybird's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale Az
Default

also looks like you did yer pulls in 2nd tha will cost ya sum too.

Not bad.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2009 | 01:49 PM
  #12  
walledition's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 7
From: Chihuahua, Mexico
Default

thanx a lot 1dirtybird...and yes they where done in second.... so what do u guys think is it good?? i mean i can feel the difference like from day to night but i wanted to see what u all think...
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2009 | 01:56 PM
  #13  
D_reks{5.3}'s Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
From: Bako
Default

Ya maybe if it was a 3rd gear pull itd be better. I just dynod mine a couple weeks ago after my TR220 swap and i put down 334rwhp in 106* weather. Gained 60rwhp from cam and headers.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2009 | 02:06 PM
  #14  
Dezert1500's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Default

For the STD correction and the smoothing on 2 your rating will be higher than SAE and a higher smoothing setting. Rule of thumb is 2.6" more with STD over SAE. I'd suspect you should be higher on motor though from a numbers stand point. The 14 bolt is hurting you as well.

Derek I believe your first dyno was SAE and after was STD with a low smoothing. So your closer to 325rwhp with an SAE correction. 280hp on a Dyno Dynamics dyno. To many variables and track is what really matters. Just shows how much variance alone in just those figures.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2009 | 02:39 PM
  #15  
D_reks{5.3}'s Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
From: Bako
Default

Originally Posted by Dezert1500
For the STD correction and the smoothing on 2 your rating will be higher than SAE and a higher smoothing setting. Rule of thumb is 2.6" more with STD over SAE. I'd suspect you should be higher on motor though from a numbers stand point. The 14 bolt is hurting you as well.

Derek I believe your first dyno was SAE and after was STD with a low smoothing. So your closer to 325rwhp with an SAE correction. 280hp on a Dyno Dynamics dyno. To many variables and track is what really matters. Just shows how much variance alone in just those figures.
Your correct. And Prolly right about 335rwhp in good weather
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2009 | 04:02 PM
  #16  
walledition's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 7
From: Chihuahua, Mexico
Default

u think i should change the 14 bolt back to a 10 bolt? how many hp would that gain??
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2009 | 04:42 PM
  #17  
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
From: East of the east bay CA
Default

It's really not about the numbers honestly. It's about how well it runs and if your happy, dynos are tools for tuning as stated before every dyno will read different.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FlowmasterMufflers
8-Lug Truck Performance
0
Aug 14, 2015 01:04 PM
03regcab sierra
Dynamometer Results & Comparisons
20
Aug 3, 2015 12:11 AM
FlowmasterMufflers
Ford Engine & Exhaust Performance
0
Jul 22, 2015 01:29 PM
FlowmasterMufflers
Ford Engine & Exhaust Performance
0
Jul 22, 2015 12:47 PM
FlowmasterMufflers
Foreign Performance Discussion
0
Jul 9, 2015 12:00 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:48 PM.