Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Graphs | Power Comparisons | Dyno Truck List

Dyno #'s for L92/L76 on a 6.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-31-2007, 08:50 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
04BlackSilverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New England
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Dyno #'s for L92/L76 on a 6.0

Well I was debating on weather to post this or not.... But what the hell.



LQ4 Block
Stock Crank
LS2 Pistons and Rods
10.9:1 Compression
L76/L92
Stock 90mm TB
228/232 .595 .595 112 Comp
4.10 Gears
Pacesetter LT w/ORY

Stock Stall
Stock 4L60
Stock muffler ( I had to take off the Dynomax that I had for the 5.3, it was too loud with the 6.0)
Crappy plugs


Old 05-31-2007, 09:02 PM
  #2  
2nd fastest 5.3 ECSB
iTrader: (14)
 
trever1t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NorCal
Posts: 26,690
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 04BlackSilverado
Well I was debating on weather to post this or not.... But what the hell.
Are you not happy? 368/355 looks good to me
Old 05-31-2007, 09:23 PM
  #3  
Banned
iTrader: (4)
 
litreddevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: From Houma La. Living n Ellisville Miss.
Posts: 5,151
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

was that through the muffler are did you open it cause don't want to sound an *** but it is a little low.

lq9 with cam shaved heads all boltons went either 369hp are 379hp and 390tq
i really would think with l92 heads and intake i would go a little over are all around 400hp
don't take this the wrong way just stating my opinion
Old 05-31-2007, 09:24 PM
  #4  
.T.
TECH Resident
 
.T.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Taxachusetts
Posts: 810
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah dude, what Trev said!
Just do up your exhaust and let that cam breathe out.
Old 06-01-2007, 04:37 AM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
04BlackSilverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New England
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by litreddevil
was that through the muffler are did you open it cause don't want to sound an *** but it is a little low.

lq9 with cam shaved heads all boltons went either 369hp are 379hp and 390tq
i really would think with l92 heads and intake i would go a little over are all around 400hp
don't take this the wrong way just stating my opinion
I don't disagree

The heads are not shaved and it is through the stock muffler and the Y pipe is a little smashed in from removing and reinstalling it a few times. I think it is a little low myself, that is why I was not sure if I wanted to post.

I am happy with the #'s. I think it should be a little higher too.

We will see once I get a good flowing quiet muffler on there and some other small things. I will keep you guys updated.
Old 06-01-2007, 07:00 AM
  #6  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
8ALTNG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Methuen, MA
Posts: 3,647
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Not bad Steve. Did Don tune it or did Josh??? Throw a magna flow on there with a cutout and you are all set. What does your fuel setup look like??
Old 06-01-2007, 07:12 AM
  #7  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (45)
 
ChevyThunder17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Michigan, the land of cold
Posts: 959
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Looks like a good setup, but I would've expected more out of that setup too. I think you are underdoing it with that cam a bit. I've been told that the valve events on those heads need to be different than the regular cathedral port heads; they have less tolerance for overlap.

Was that a cam from an old head setup?
Old 06-01-2007, 07:17 AM
  #8  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (73)
 
Derek @ EDO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 4,072
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

i think it should be higher because my cam only 6.0 with the 20's had 388/391 with a smaller cam. You must have more left in the tune or possibly some fueling issues. When i posted my first dyno everyone thought it was right and told me i couldnt expect to get close to 400rwhp with a cam only 6.0

Last edited by DLH2006; 06-01-2007 at 08:27 AM.
Old 06-01-2007, 09:28 AM
  #9  
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (4)
 
TURBHOE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Jacksonville FL.
Posts: 6,318
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

don't those heads flow really well with higher lifts.
Old 06-01-2007, 09:59 AM
  #10  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (45)
 
ChevyThunder17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Michigan, the land of cold
Posts: 959
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

They flow 320-330 ish @ .600". Ask Richard@WCCH about them more, he's done testing with them. I think the cam is all wrong for that setup.


Quick Reply: Dyno #'s for L92/L76 on a 6.0



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:08 PM.