Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Graphs | Power Comparisons | Dyno Truck List

Dyno Results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 26, 2011 | 09:56 PM
  #1  
99ta's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 312
Likes: 1
From: Gonzales, LA
Default Dyno Results

Here are the dyno results of my truck after my cam swap, keep in mind the motor is a 180000+ mile 5.3. Mods are: AEM Dry Flow, OBX Long Tubes, Futral 218-224 114ls Cam, Patriot Dual Springs, FMS Push Rods, 3in Cutout, Magnaflow Muffler, 4l80e Swap, Stock Converter. Cutout was closed, converter was locked.


Last edited by 99ta; Jan 27, 2011 at 07:45 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2011 | 09:59 PM
  #2  
00ChevyScott's Avatar
Wearin' da big hat
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 10,262
Likes: 9
From: Over There
Default

Care to elaborate why FLT transmissions "suck"?
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2011 | 10:31 PM
  #3  
99ta's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 312
Likes: 1
From: Gonzales, LA
Default

Just my opinion after I broke two of their "level 4's" one with a Radix on my truck and the second after I took the Radix off and only had bolt-on's. Also I wasn't happy with their "warranty". Mainly my idea is if your gonna do anything with a truck save the money and go 80e to start with.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2011 | 02:01 AM
  #4  
Spoolin's Avatar
GFYS and STFU
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,870
Likes: 4
From: Here and sometimes there too.
Default

Those are decent numbers.
Sorry to hear about your bad experience with FLT, but yeah 60e's (in most cases) are time bombs no matter how much you build them up.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2011 | 02:47 AM
  #5  
99ta's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 312
Likes: 1
From: Gonzales, LA
Default

Originally Posted by Spoolin
Those are decent numbers.
Sorry to hear about your bad experience with FLT, but yeah 60e's (in most cases) are time bombs no matter how much you build them up.

I agree!!!!
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2011 | 04:39 AM
  #6  
TIM Z's Avatar
11 sec. Truck Mod
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,736
Likes: 4
From: OH IO :(
Default

When i bought my 2000 it had 183,000 on the 5.3 , it ran great, i cammed it, but didnt change the lifters and had one fail, so i swapped in a 6.0, BUT after taking the heads off the 5.3, it STILL had crosshatching on the cylinder walls!!! It had a LOT of life left in it!!!


Cool numbers! Miles aint nothin on a cared for LSx engine!!
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2011 | 07:56 AM
  #7  
NORTH TEXAS TBSS's Avatar
formerly NORTH TEXAS TBSS, then slowgibbs, and now back to NORTH TEXAS TBSS :) (2012-05-27)
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Default

Nice numbers
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2011 | 08:14 AM
  #8  
99ta's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 312
Likes: 1
From: Gonzales, LA
Default

I was a little surprised they were this good going through an 80e. It must not hurt the numbers as bad as I thought, although I know dyno is for tuning. That is why I'm trying to make it to No Problem, or State Capitol ASAP.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2011 | 08:58 AM
  #9  
BlackGMC's Avatar
Resident Retard
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 17,216
Likes: 20
From: Fort Worth - TX
Default

that is a damn nice TQ curve!!
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2011 | 03:01 PM
  #10  
dlt76028's Avatar
12 Second Truck Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,883
Likes: 2
From: Crowley, TX
Default

good numbers, especially through the 80e.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:29 AM.