Drag Racing Fastest Truck List inside, sortable for any make/model/engine listed.
TIME SLIP DATABASE

fastest 4.8 !

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 7, 2012 | 09:07 PM
  #31  
quicksilverado's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,944
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, Ga.
Default

Originally Posted by JoeyGC5
Didn't Charlie from Vengence racing go like 12.80's on an NA 4.8?
Don't know for sure. Charlie tends to sand bag about his set up.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2012 | 09:51 AM
  #32  
Notorious hd's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: south south texas
Default

Lol ^^^^
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2012 | 11:03 PM
  #33  
bmd_CL's Avatar
TECH Resident
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
From: H-Town
Default

Im just wondering, i saw where you posted how the 4.8 gets better gas mileage than the 6.0...how good of gas mileage are you getting with a 228/3600 combo in a less than 300 cubic inch motor? Personally, if youre worried about gas mileage i wouldnt be driving the truck daily therefore that tidbit of info would be pointless? Just my .02
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2012 | 11:06 PM
  #34  
bmd_CL's Avatar
TECH Resident
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
From: H-Town
Default

Also, idk if im just biased or what but i dont really see the point of trying to push a 4.8 na? In the end itll just be cheaper to either go fi or swap in a bigger inch motor. I mean a pretty nasty setup(minus the 4.8) only running 13.5s? Im hoping for less than that with just a small cam 5.3 and 3200 converter, maybe a step up in gear
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2012 | 04:02 PM
  #35  
Jake99's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by bmd_CL
Im just wondering, i saw where you posted how the 4.8 gets better gas mileage than the 6.0...how good of gas mileage are you getting with a 228/3600 combo in a less than 300 cubic inch motor? Personally, if youre worried about gas mileage i wouldnt be driving the truck daily therefore that tidbit of info would be pointless? Just my .02
The way I see it is 11s in a 6.0 gets boring too, I really enjoy pushing things to there limits and seeing how fast it gos for what it is, 13.5 is fun to race if it shouldnt be that fast. But once the goal is met I like to move on, we have done a few stock 6.0 swaps into a singe cab and they get 18mpg if they are just tuned, my bros had 4.56 gears and did 18 on a trip.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2012 | 04:43 PM
  #36  
Team Paulie's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
From: Montana
Default

Right now with the longtubes,TR-6's and a wheatley tune I have been getting around 15 MPG outta my 4.8,but I got a heavy foot too.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2012 | 12:30 AM
  #37  
bmd_CL's Avatar
TECH Resident
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
From: H-Town
Default

i understand what you mean jake...to me it just seems like trying to set a record for the fastest na 4.8 is like trying to be the best inmate at the county jail...honestly all the record crap is getting on my nerves...i say just build the truck how you wanna build it and go racing, have fun with it. dont be worried about some record....but idk? i never really understood it
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2012 | 12:31 AM
  #38  
bmd_CL's Avatar
TECH Resident
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
From: H-Town
Default

with my lts, tune and cai, i get like 24 on the highway in my 5.3...to me it seems like the smaller the motor in the same size vehicle, the harder it has to push itself to turn the same weight...? idk tho
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2012 | 10:25 PM
  #39  
Killer5.3's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
From: OK
Default

Seems like I saw something online in lasy year or two about a 4.8 with TFS heads and custom cam running like 12.40 n/a ,but, can't remember where or who it was. I would think it could be done with the right combo and some weight reduction could probably get in the high 11's.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2012 | 08:22 PM
  #40  
Killer5.3's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
From: OK
Default

I found an old article and it was a guy Charlie from Vengance Racing. 4.8 rcsb with TFS 205 heads and TFS cam specs around 220 @.050. Not sure about converter etc, but said it went 12.80 @110 which sounds like with better converter, suspension etc could have went low 12's.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:58 PM.