Dodge Engine & Exhaust Performance All EFI, Hemi, Magnum, 4.7, 5.9

360 heads?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 02:06 AM
  #1  
04BlackGmc's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,425
Likes: 0
From: STL
Default 360 heads?

Are regular 360 headsd any different from R/T heads?
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 12:15 PM
  #2  
MrDestinE's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
From: Baytown
Default

These days the R/T package is mostly apperance but it will usually have the large or higher perf engine. late model 5.2 and 5.9 heads are the same even though the cast #'s are different the port configuration and valve sizes are identical. Some early model 5.9's had larger ports and valves on the High perf models.

TJ
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2005 | 07:21 AM
  #3  
BigPurp's Avatar
12 Second Truck Club
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

The dakota r/t heads are the same as the heads that came on Rams and Ram vans, same as on any 5.2 or 5.9L magnum motor. The mopar performance R/T heads however are quite a bit better.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2005 | 04:04 PM
  #4  
04BlackGmc's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,425
Likes: 0
From: STL
Default

cool someone was wondering..
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2005 | 09:31 PM
  #5  
devilbrad's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Cali
Default

Originally Posted by MrDestinE
These days the R/T package is mostly apperance but it will usually have the large or higher perf engine. late model 5.2 and 5.9 heads are the same even though the cast #'s are different the port configuration and valve sizes are identical. Some early model 5.9's had larger ports and valves on the High perf models.

TJ
I hate to sound like a complete ***, but you are wrong on all counts. The R/T Dakotas had no performance advantage at all, ever, over any of the other 5.9 trucks or vans. The engines were identical every single year. Its a huge misconception that R/T trucks had R/T heads. And I hate to hear of people scourging wrecking yards looking for the ellusive wrecked R/T Dakota to get the heads off of it.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2005 | 09:22 PM
  #6  
MrDestinE's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
From: Baytown
Default

Originally Posted by devilbrad
I hate to sound like a complete ***, but you are wrong on all counts. The R/T Dakotas had no performance advantage at all, ever, over any of the other 5.9 trucks or vans. The engines were identical every single year. Its a huge misconception that R/T trucks had R/T heads. And I hate to hear of people scourging wrecking yards looking for the ellusive wrecked R/T Dakota to get the heads off of it.

Uh, did you even read my post???? Hmmm Perhaps I was not clear, The Earlier PRE-Magnum heads did have differences in valve and port sizes. ALL of the late Magnum heads are the same...
TJ
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2005 | 09:43 PM
  #7  
devilbrad's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Cali
Default

Originally Posted by MrDestinE
Uh, did you even read my post???? Hmmm Perhaps I was not clear, The Earlier PRE-Magnum heads did have differences in valve and port sizes. ALL of the late Magnum heads are the same...
TJ
Yes, I did read your post. This was a discussion about Magnum heads, so I assumed as such. I now agree with your post on the pre-mag stuff.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Three6GMC
GM Parts Classifieds
5
Nov 5, 2015 10:02 PM
lsxmalibu
GM Parts Classifieds
4
Sep 9, 2015 11:08 PM
03regcab sierra
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
2
Sep 9, 2015 02:02 PM
thewrx
Cars and Motorcycle Classifieds
1
Aug 12, 2015 08:28 PM
sauldgold
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
3
Jul 23, 2015 02:15 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:52 AM.