Intake manifold hard data (UPDATED: 5/11/12)
#14
Originally Posted by N4cer
LS2 has long been proven over on LS1tech to be basically an LS1 intake with a 90mm opening... not worth it. LS6 is superior.
That's interesting. I knew that was the case for the LS2 truck mani's but didn't know it was the same on the car side.
#16
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Las Vegas,NV
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So guys what's a ect plate and port only? I'd like to see the same charts but with the truck manifolds on there also. I know they're on the static flow charts, but not on the hp and tq sheets. I'd like to see them constantly compared to see power gains and loses and where they happen. BTW guys, awesome step up for getting this info.
Last edited by 92scsb; 08-14-2007 at 10:05 PM. Reason: adding content
#17
11 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: DFW
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by N4cer
LS2 has long been proven over on LS1tech to be basically an LS1 intake with a 90mm opening... not worth it. LS6 is superior.
Now if you look at the numbers here the LS2 intake is very close to the LS6 intake but at 5600RPM the LS6 intake falls off compared to the LS2.
#20
How do I change this text
iTrader: (26)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Behind the TIG welder
Posts: 7,294
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by 92scsb
What vehicle/motor set up do you guys think would benifit from the vic jr? You guys think an asa would run pretty good with the vic jr?
The vic jr, with it's short runners would be better for a "RPM Engine" but with it's smallish plenum (not sure of size) it gains back some of the low end. The Vic jr is more for suiteable for engines running above 6,000 than below, depending on the throttle body location of course.