Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring HP Tuners | EFILive | Hand Held Programmers | Stand Alone PCM's | Electronics | Wiring Diagrams

Who adjusts thier tune for the 10% or up to 10% ethanol at the pump these days...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 27, 2010 | 09:35 PM
  #21  
00ChevyScott's Avatar
Wearin' da big hat
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 10,262
Likes: 9
From: Over There
Default

Sounds like a waste of time to me... Trying to squeeze that extra 3 rwhp out of that 4.8 Corey? Lol
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2010 | 09:35 PM
  #22  
KLUG'S SS's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
From: BERRIEN CENTER,MICHIGAN
Default

Originally Posted by Avalanche2002
Holy crap, man, you're more **** than I am!
It's a disease.



But on a serious note Ford is starting to recognize where we are heading with these ethanol blended fuels as they are starting to have some of their factory calibrations setup already for E10, I will have to double check a tune file but I believe for one if I am not mistaken the new mustangs are set to 14.1 afr
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2010 | 09:38 PM
  #23  
dc_justin's Avatar
Hello Dave
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 3
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Originally Posted by 00ChevyScott
Sounds like a waste of time to me... Trying to squeeze that extra 3 rwhp out of that 4.8 Corey? Lol
He won't see any power out of it, just better consistency every time he goes and re-tunes it. As it is right now, all of his wideband time results in a VE table that is at least 4-5% higher than actual, which then affects the PCMs spark reference, torque calculation, etc, etc.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2010 | 09:42 PM
  #24  
00ChevyScott's Avatar
Wearin' da big hat
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 10,262
Likes: 9
From: Over There
Default

Originally Posted by dc_justin
He won't see any power out of it, just better consistency every time he goes and re-tunes it. As it is right now, all of his wideband time results in a VE table that is at least 4-5% higher than actual, which then affects the PCMs spark reference, torque calculation, etc, etc.
So quicker (hardly noticeable) fuel corrections and throttle response? Smoother throttle transitions?
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2010 | 09:44 PM
  #25  
dc_justin's Avatar
Hello Dave
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 3
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Originally Posted by 00ChevyScott
So quicker (hardly noticeable) fuel corrections and throttle response? Smoother throttle transitions?
Initially.

In a completely closed loop vehicle, 14.68 would yield trims in the 4-5% range assuming all else is perfect with E10. Specifying 14.1x would yield trims very close to 0.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2010 | 09:50 PM
  #26  
Atomic's Avatar
I have a gauge for that
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,282
Likes: 438
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

I have found stoich for fuel in my area to be around 14.4 which would indicate around 5% eth. I found this by comparing trims to AFR error in steady state type conditions.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2010 | 10:00 PM
  #27  
BlackGMC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Resident Retard
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 17,216
Likes: 20
From: Fort Worth - TX
Default

Originally Posted by 00ChevyScott
Sounds like a waste of time to me... Trying to squeeze that extra 3 rwhp out of that 4.8 Corey? Lol
Originally Posted by 00ChevyScott
So quicker (hardly noticeable) fuel corrections and throttle response? Smoother throttle transitions?

don't be mad that you have had EFI Live for 1+ years and you still have no idea how to use it.

But this does answer some of my questions about the side affect/ wierd issues i have seen after retuning my truck 2 weeks ago... I like messing around with tuning, so if i have time this weekend i am going to check out the differences.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 09:32 AM
  #28  
fastrt's Avatar
11 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,986
Likes: 1
From: Midlothian, Texas
Default

so for 5-7% blend in my area, a 14.4ish would bring trims close to 0? and a true E10 would be 14.17 right. so my question is how much of a diff is it to tune for 14.68 vs 14.4?
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 09:44 AM
  #29  
BlackGMC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Resident Retard
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 17,216
Likes: 20
From: Fort Worth - TX
Default

from my understanding is that would affect your airmass calcs. for example: you would be referencing the wrong value in your spark table, thus your commanded spark value would be a little off... Also your IDC would be up a little bit too.

But i have a question. is E85 and E10 similar? Meaning E85 contains 85% ethanol, and E10 contains 10% ethanol? Or am i way off... if i am not does that mean if the airmass was correct would we be able to get away with a little more spark due to the higher octane rating of ethanol? Or do i have things completely wrong???
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 09:45 AM
  #30  
lownslo's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,560
Likes: 0
From: Jxn, Miss
Default

ha run the timing up until it knocks and pull it back just a hair
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:29 PM.