GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

2000 5.3 Dyno 235k Miles and bolt-ons

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 17, 2016 | 12:29 PM
  #1  
JohnDaMan's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
15 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Sumter, SC
Default 2000 5.3 Dyno 235k Miles and bolt-ons

Dyno'd my 2000 5.3 Silverado this Saturday. Mods are 1 3/4" headers, off road Y, single 3" exhaust, Spectre CAI, e-fan, FTI 3200 stall, 4.10s and my tune. Final AFR was 12.5:1 and timing was 28 degrees. Pump 93 gas

Reply
Old Oct 17, 2016 | 05:25 PM
  #2  
madmann26's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,985
Likes: 372
From: Somewhere north of 285, south of 985.
Default

That's actually damn strong with that many miles.

Nice job!!


Originally Posted by JohnDaMan
Dyno'd my 2000 5.3 Silverado this Saturday. Mods are 1 3/4" headers, off road Y, single 3" exhaust, Spectre CAI, e-fan, FTI 3200 stall, 4.10s and my tune. Final AFR was 12.5:1 and timing was 28 degrees. Pump 93 gas

Reply
Old Oct 17, 2016 | 05:34 PM
  #3  
JohnDaMan's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
15 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Sumter, SC
Default

Thanks. I thought the torque curve was the best part. The pull started around 2200ish RPMs and it already had 90+% of peak torque. I attribute that to the collector design on the headers I modified. I went with a true merge collector and transition cone on some CalSpeed headers. I think there are pics here on my gallery. Note, this truck is tuned in speed density but the MAF is still in the intake tract. It's just unplugged. Wish I would have gotten a video.

If anyone needs help tuning a truck I've gotten pretty decent at it over the past year. I can help.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2016 | 05:40 PM
  #4  
FFDP's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 5,282
Likes: 600
From: Rogers, MN
Default

I'd be curious if it made slightly more with the MAF/VE combo between 2500-4500rpm. I think it's always worthwhile to keep the MAF if you can and you wouldn't have to have a seperate IAT.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2016 | 08:11 PM
  #5  
GM1697's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,568
Likes: 12
From: in MA or SC
Default

Wow. You made good power. I think I only laid down ~275 with a mild cam and stock exhaust manifolds
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2016 | 09:03 PM
  #6  
Drspencer's Avatar
TECH Regular
5 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 447
Likes: 80
From: Bradenton, FL
Default

Good to see the headers at work. I get mine back from Performance Coatings next week.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2016 | 09:56 PM
  #7  
JohnDaMan's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
15 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Sumter, SC
Default

Originally Posted by FFDP
I'd be curious if it made slightly more with the MAF/VE combo between 2500-4500rpm. I think it's always worthwhile to keep the MAF if you can and you wouldn't have to have a seperate IAT.
Eh, I doubt it. It's already in PE mode at that point. And at 2500rpm it's making roughly 93% of the peak torque at 4000 RPM. I don't think anyone would ask for more?
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2016 | 10:00 PM
  #8  
FFDP's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 5,282
Likes: 600
From: Rogers, MN
Default

It doesn't matter that it's in PE mode, it's how it see's the airflow into the engine to make proper calculations.

Having both working can make transition fueling much smoother and the MAF is a rather good tool for tuning in the higher RPM's. That's why I said it's worthwhile to keep the MAF if you can use it.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2016 | 05:55 PM
  #9  
Fast355's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 642
Likes: 21
From: Euless, TX
Default

Originally Posted by JohnDaMan
Eh, I doubt it. It's already in PE mode at that point. And at 2500rpm it's making roughly 93% of the peak torque at 4000 RPM. I don't think anyone would ask for more?
On my old 350 Vortec there is a definite difference with and without the MAF. The speed density tune is spot on as is the MAF tables. The way the PCM blends and filters the airflow values helps the keep the fueling even more consistent. The MAF also helps during the transitions.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2016 | 08:26 PM
  #10  
JohnDaMan's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
15 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Sumter, SC
Default

Originally Posted by Fast355
On my old 350 Vortec there is a definite difference with and without the MAF. The speed density tune is spot on as is the MAF tables. The way the PCM blends and filters the airflow values helps the keep the fueling even more consistent. The MAF also helps during the transitions.
Are we talking about full throttle power or driving in general? The reason I ask is because this thread is titled dyno results of my 2000 Silverado.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:47 PM.