PerformanceTrucks.net Forums

5.2 98 dakota vs 01 5.3 chevy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 09:28 PM
  #21  
Tool's Avatar
Tool
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Default
there's my competition. i should upload a pic of the Mopar.

1-1 for now hehe
Reply
0
Old Sep 9, 2007 | 02:19 AM
  #22  
chevynutss's Avatar
chevynutss
Teching In
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Default
Originally Posted by Tool
sorry i thought that they were all aluminum. what year did they make them all aluminum?
All 5.3's have cast iron blocks no matter what year...unless you get the HO 5.3 option. You could only get them on extended cab 4X4 trucks.
Reply
0
Old Sep 9, 2007 | 08:48 AM
  #23  
RandomHero's Avatar
RandomHero
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 1
From: Austin,TX Name:Mark
Default
Originally Posted by chevynutss
All 5.3's have cast iron blocks no matter what year...unless you get the HO 5.3 option. You could only get them on extended cab 4X4 trucks.
Wow. That's good to know. Hopefully they've figured this out over the last year and a half. THAT HOW OLD THIS POST IS
Reply
0
Old Feb 3, 2008 | 12:46 PM
  #24  
00ChevyScott's Avatar
00ChevyScott
Wearin' da big hat
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 10,262
Likes: 9
From: Over There
Default
theres no way a ecsb silverado is ONLY 100 lbs heavier than an ecsb dakota...
Reply
0
Old Jan 25, 2009 | 08:55 PM
  #25  
QLF's Avatar
QLF
Launching!
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
From: Abbeville, LA
Default
Originally Posted by 00ChevyScott
theres no way a ecsb silverado is ONLY 100 lbs heavier than an ecsb dakota...


That's what I was thinking. More like 500...
Reply
0
Old Jan 25, 2009 | 10:17 PM
  #26  
wastedrubber's Avatar
wastedrubber
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 0
From: Metro Detroit
Default
does this thread have a timer to pop up every year or so?
Reply
0
Old Jan 26, 2009 | 07:20 AM
  #27  
nighthawk08's Avatar
nighthawk08
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 881
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio
Default
Originally Posted by QLF
That's what I was thinking. More like 500...
i'd say more than that.

my ecsb 02 dakota was 3800 lbs.
Reply
0
Old Jan 26, 2009 | 07:31 AM
  #28  
95 bright teal's Avatar
95 bright teal
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,862
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
Default
Nice thread dig guys the OP hasnt been on the site for 3 years
Reply
0
Old Jan 26, 2009 | 08:04 AM
  #29  
00ChevyScott's Avatar
00ChevyScott
Wearin' da big hat
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 10,262
Likes: 9
From: Over There
Default
Originally Posted by 95 bright teal
Nice thread dig guys the OP hasnt been on the site for 3 years
I wonder if he lost to that chevy yet.
Reply
0
Old Jan 28, 2009 | 05:56 PM
  #30  
Black5.9R/T's Avatar
Black5.9R/T
Teching In
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, Missouri
Default
Originally Posted by colyneedsv8
i'd say more than that.

my ecsb 02 dakota was 3800 lbs.

maybe my truck is fat and heavy then because i have weighed my standard cab R/T and it was 4788
Reply
0



Advanced Search

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:07 PM.