INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

Different Cam Profile

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 2, 2010 | 10:39 AM
  #11  
SweetS10V8's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by sierra69
Awesome! You gave me alot of info about my future mods.what are you running?
6.0L LQ9
Lingenfelter CNC L92 heads w/ GM LS3 lightweight valves
Comp 219/235 .607/.621 113+5 Cam
Comp 918 springs w/ tool steel retainers (<1g heavier than titanium, but doenst wear away)
FAST LSXR 102mm Intake
GM 90mm LS2 TB
Comp .105 wall pushrods
1 3/4" longtubes
3" dual mandrel bent exhaust
Comp 850-16 lifters
25% UD pulley
Stock rockers with Comp trunion upgrade (everyone should do this)

Originally Posted by budhayes3
I really like that FAST LSXR 102mm intake...maybe some day...
LSXR or LSXRT? The RT should make more power than the LSXR.
Reply
Old May 2, 2010 | 05:52 PM
  #12  
MPFD's Avatar
11 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
Default

I have the new patriot cam and its pretty good. I would have actually liked to have gotten the cam you have when I bought mine, but they had stopped making it. Gunner told me that the new cam made about the same power but idle'd better and was easier to tune for. My cam sounds good at idle and makes great power so I'm happy with it. I have a "BIG" cam sitting in the closet waiting to go in, but it will probably have to wait a little while. At least till I get a gear...
Reply
Old May 3, 2010 | 09:58 PM
  #13  
budhayes3's Avatar
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 2
From: Hackensack, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by SweetS10V8
LSXR or LSXRT? The RT should make more power than the LSXR.
The taller one of the two...would that be the "T"? Is the "T" for "truck" or am I totally off?...
Reply
Old May 4, 2010 | 08:16 AM
  #14  
Preston129's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 1
Default

The "T" version is the taller one. In FAST's literature, they say it's designed for trucks and cathedral-port headed cars with hood clearance. I think the only reason we don't see more of them is they just don't fit under a gen-4 fbody hood.
Reply
Old May 8, 2010 | 06:16 PM
  #15  
ByuTrukr's Avatar
Thread Starter
formerly ByuTrukFreak
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
From: Golden Meadow,LA
Default

That intake sure is awesome looking, i wouldn't mind having that, I still run the stock truck intake.The 223/231* .610/.617 112 cam looks good too. But I'm kinda scared to go that much lift with the Patriot heads, the springs are supposed to be good to.650 lift, but I had some Comp R lifters(Which I'm still running) and Pro Magnum roller rockers with 1.75 ratio and I had valve train problems, instability so I was told. I figured the lift was .602 with those rockers, I put the stock rockers back on and my problem was gone. Anyone using Patriots 5.3 heads with that much lift have any problems.

Last edited by ByuTrukr; May 10, 2010 at 06:39 PM. Reason: hit wrong key
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2010 | 08:49 PM
  #16  
ByuTrukr's Avatar
Thread Starter
formerly ByuTrukFreak
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
From: Golden Meadow,LA
Default

Originally Posted by Preston129
The "T" version is the taller one. In FAST's literature, they say it's designed for trucks and cathedral-port headed cars with hood clearance. I think the only reason we don't see more of them is they just don't fit under a gen-4 fbody hood.
I think it's because it's too expensive.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dan Neumann
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
11
Aug 7, 2022 09:06 AM
Greatdivider
NITROUS OXIDE
15
Sep 9, 2015 09:52 AM
steves86ta
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
5
Jul 28, 2015 10:21 AM
bgray
SHOW & SHINE DISCUSSION
8
Jul 23, 2015 10:56 AM
Atomic
THE TRUCK STOP
11
Jul 22, 2015 03:41 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:24 AM.