PerformanceTrucks.net Forums

PerformanceTrucks.net Forums (https://www.performancetrucks.net/forums/)
-   INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS (https://www.performancetrucks.net/forums/internal-engine-modifications-158/)
-   -   Connecting Rod Math question? (https://www.performancetrucks.net/forums/internal-engine-modifications-158/connecting-rod-math-question-353737/)

moregrip Dec 1, 2005 10:33 AM

Connecting Rod Math question?
 
Need a sanity check on my math:

Since there are "stocked" pistons made for a 4" stroke Crank using a 6.125" Connecting Rod.

Shouldn't I be able to run those pistons with a stock stroke crank(3.622") and a 6.314" connecting rod or there abouts?

Okie5.3 Dec 1, 2005 11:41 AM

right on the money, assuming a measured DH of 9.245". you'd be looking at what a 71% rod/stroke ratio.

moregrip Dec 2, 2005 07:53 AM


Originally Posted by Okie5.3
right on the money, assuming a measured DH of 9.245". you'd be looking at what a 71% rod/stroke ratio.

cool, thanks for the math check :usa:

TurboGibbs Dec 4, 2005 12:37 PM

You could run a 4.8 rod (6.285) and deck the block .030 and have the same thing for a lot less money. :judge:

vanillagorilla Dec 4, 2005 01:27 PM

To tell where the piston will wind up in relation to the deck, I always use deck height-1/2 stroke-rod length-comp height. + number= out of the hole, - number= in the hole, 0=zero deck. :)

So with the two compression heights being the same:
9.245"-2.00"-6.125"-X=9.245"-1.811"-6.314"-X

You are correct sir, but where are you going to get a rod with that exact length? Custom? Titanium perhaps?

TurboGibbs Dec 4, 2005 02:33 PM

That is why I suggested the 4.8 rod.
A custom set of pistons and stock rods would be a lot cheaper than pistons and custom rods of course as well.

vanillagorilla Dec 4, 2005 03:14 PM


Originally Posted by mjhoward
That is why I suggested the 4.8 rod.
A custom set of pistons and stock rods would be a lot cheaper than pistons and custom rods of course as well.

Those would put him about 0.029" in the hole, assuming the off the shelf stroker pistons are at zero deck with the 4" stroke/6.125"rod combo. It'll drop his compression ratio quite a bit too. :)

mattrem Dec 4, 2005 03:27 PM

The 4.8 uses a longer rod? interesting.

Okie5.3 Dec 4, 2005 05:03 PM


Originally Posted by mjhoward
You could run a 4.8 rod (6.285) and deck the block .030 and have the same thing for a lot less money. :judge:

that would leave him with a CH of only .93". that would make for a lightweight piston that's for sure. wouldn't you run into some piston rock unless tolerances were dead nuts on???

TurboGibbs Dec 4, 2005 06:26 PM


Originally Posted by vanillagorilla
Those would put him about 0.029" in the hole, assuming the off the shelf stroker pistons are at zero deck with the 4" stroke/6.125"rod combo. It'll drop his compression ratio quite a bit too. :)

See post #4.

"wouldn't you run into some piston rock unless tolerances were dead nuts on???"

The length of the skirt controls that.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:38 AM.


© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands