![]() |
Connecting Rod Math question?
Need a sanity check on my math:
Since there are "stocked" pistons made for a 4" stroke Crank using a 6.125" Connecting Rod. Shouldn't I be able to run those pistons with a stock stroke crank(3.622") and a 6.314" connecting rod or there abouts? |
right on the money, assuming a measured DH of 9.245". you'd be looking at what a 71% rod/stroke ratio.
|
Originally Posted by Okie5.3
right on the money, assuming a measured DH of 9.245". you'd be looking at what a 71% rod/stroke ratio.
|
You could run a 4.8 rod (6.285) and deck the block .030 and have the same thing for a lot less money. :judge:
|
To tell where the piston will wind up in relation to the deck, I always use deck height-1/2 stroke-rod length-comp height. + number= out of the hole, - number= in the hole, 0=zero deck. :)
So with the two compression heights being the same: 9.245"-2.00"-6.125"-X=9.245"-1.811"-6.314"-X You are correct sir, but where are you going to get a rod with that exact length? Custom? Titanium perhaps? |
That is why I suggested the 4.8 rod.
A custom set of pistons and stock rods would be a lot cheaper than pistons and custom rods of course as well. |
Originally Posted by mjhoward
That is why I suggested the 4.8 rod.
A custom set of pistons and stock rods would be a lot cheaper than pistons and custom rods of course as well. |
The 4.8 uses a longer rod? interesting.
|
Originally Posted by mjhoward
You could run a 4.8 rod (6.285) and deck the block .030 and have the same thing for a lot less money. :judge:
|
Originally Posted by vanillagorilla
Those would put him about 0.029" in the hole, assuming the off the shelf stroker pistons are at zero deck with the 4" stroke/6.125"rod combo. It'll drop his compression ratio quite a bit too. :)
"wouldn't you run into some piston rock unless tolerances were dead nuts on???" The length of the skirt controls that. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:38 AM. |
© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands