Notices
GMT K2xx Trucks General Discussion 2014+ Trucks | General Discussion

18 F150 EcoBoost+10speed = Fast!

Old 11-05-2018, 09:21 PM
  #21  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
Gorske's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: St. Joseph,MI
Posts: 398
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

I was able to take owning a FI truck off my vehicle bucket list and as impressed as I am with the 5.3 I would still like to own a 6.2 truck and mess with that. As much as I don't like the new GM trucks a 6.2 truck with the 10speed sounds temping plus add the fact it is 450lbs lighter makes me think with a tune and e85 you could get one of those 19s in the high to mid 12s possibly. Then you add headers as well and you might see mid to low 12s. Who knows just have to get over the look of them.
Old 11-05-2018, 09:37 PM
  #22  
TECH Junkie
 
ZO6Ted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 3,294
Received 252 Likes on 164 Posts
Default

I had no idea the fords ran like that with so little. No plans to sell mine since its close to paid for so I will definitely be seeing 11's in the next 12 mo.
Old 11-06-2018, 01:30 AM
  #23  
Admin
iTrader: (22)
 
03sierraslt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Western PA
Posts: 19,004
Received 216 Likes on 172 Posts
Default

The 2nd gen 3.5 (2017 up) has dual injection. Port and DI, I like this mainly due to eliminating the issues with intake valve build up. But this opens areas for increased power also. Naturally the gen 2 is also rated higher then the previous ones also.
Old 11-06-2018, 08:46 AM
  #24  
Staging Lane
 
Zman82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Gorske
I was able to take owning a FI truck off my vehicle bucket list and as impressed as I am with the 5.3 I would still like to own a 6.2 truck and mess with that. As much as I don't like the new GM trucks a 6.2 truck with the 10speed sounds temping plus add the fact it is 450lbs lighter makes me think with a tune and e85 you could get one of those 19s in the high to mid 12s possibly. Then you add headers as well and you might see mid to low 12s. Who knows just have to get over the look of them.
new gm truck is not any faster.

I had the '19 6.2 10sp for 24 hours. I felt 0 difference in acceleration from my 6.2/speed.

Like I mentioned earlier, when ford gets the 10speed they knock like a 1/2 second off the 1/4 mile. When GM does it gets slower. (slower because the same acceleration with less weight)
Somehow the fastest l86 truck is the one with the 6 speed. The 8speed is a little slower, and the 10speed is a little slower than that (if they were equal weight).

even the c7 vette gets faster when they switch go from 6speed to 8speed
fords are rocket ships with their new trans
every single manufacturer out there that installs new transmissions with more gears gets faster

not GM trucks
Old 11-06-2018, 09:41 AM
  #25  
TECH Junkie
 
ZO6Ted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 3,294
Received 252 Likes on 164 Posts
Default

Is it because they have to detune them more for mileage and emissions to hang on to the V8's you think? Gotta be faster after a good tune but then the warranty...can't win with GM.
Old 11-06-2018, 10:10 AM
  #26  
Staging Lane
 
Zman82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ZO6Ted
Is it because they have to detune them more for mileage and emissions to hang on to the V8's you think? Gotta be faster after a good tune but then the warranty...can't win with GM.
yeah but you can tune a trans based on throttle input

if they want to create sluggish shifting for part throttle, fine, but at WOT there is no excuse. Evident by every single OEM out there doing a better job at tuning them.

If anything more aggressive trans tuning is better for fuel economy
Old 11-06-2018, 10:19 AM
  #27  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
 
arthursc2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,288
Received 1,433 Likes on 1,061 Posts
Default

If the past 20yrs is any indicator, I think GM softens the trans intentionally. Either for comfort, drive train survivability, economy; you name it. You guess is as good as mine. But we've seen it in 4L60s, 4L80s, 6L80s/90 (even in the CTS-V/ZL1).

I dont know why they do it. We all agree it slows the vehicle down, adds wear to the trans and shortens life. My G8 after a tune and trans recalibration was a whole new animal. I would expect the same story with 10spd trucks, provided the trans can be tuned.
Old 11-06-2018, 02:38 PM
  #28  
Admin
iTrader: (22)
 
03sierraslt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Western PA
Posts: 19,004
Received 216 Likes on 172 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by arthursc2
If the past 20yrs is any indicator, I think GM softens the trans intentionally. Either for comfort, drive train survivability, economy; you name it. You guess is as good as mine. But we've seen it in 4L60s, 4L80s, 6L80s/90 (even in the CTS-V/ZL1).

I dont know why they do it. We all agree it slows the vehicle down, adds wear to the trans and shortens life. My G8 after a tune and trans recalibration was a whole new animal. I would expect the same story with 10spd trucks, provided the trans can be tuned.
yep they do. And I hate it.
Old 11-06-2018, 04:34 PM
  #29  
Mod with training wheels
iTrader: (16)
 
smokeshow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Detroit
Posts: 7,738
Received 202 Likes on 138 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by arthursc2
If the past 20yrs is any indicator, I think GM softens the trans intentionally. Either for comfort, drive train survivability, economy; you name it. You guess is as good as mine. But we've seen it in 4L60s, 4L80s, 6L80s/90 (even in the CTS-V/ZL1).

I dont know why they do it. We all agree it slows the vehicle down, adds wear to the trans and shortens life. My G8 after a tune and trans recalibration was a whole new animal. I would expect the same story with 10spd trucks, provided the trans can be tuned.
Pleasing the masses is the reason. People who like firm performance-oriented shifts are in the minority. So you get the product that is an average of all customers' expectations. They're also calibrated so that they will last under heavy abuse in lots of environments.
Old 11-06-2018, 04:51 PM
  #30  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
1994Vmax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,636
Received 103 Likes on 74 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by smokeshow
Pleasing the masses is the reason. People who like firm performance-oriented shifts are in the minority. So you get the product that is an average of all customers' expectations. They're also calibrated so that they will last under heavy abuse in lots of environments.
Saying that is fine. But yet any other manufacturer beyond GM doesn't have as shitty of shifting stock ( the premise of the last bit of the convo) and it's not hurting their sales. It's not like Mary Mayweather will take a new F150 for a spin and find its trans tuning offensive... they don't. GM just can't tune anything properly... never have and never will. It's why aftermarket software is pretty well a must and you get nothing but "night and day" commentary on naturally aspirated trucks.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 18 F150 EcoBoost+10speed = Fast!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:54 PM.