WTB?? need a DD big cam for a 2008 denali
#21
I see. I know the LY6's came with it hence why I asked. VVT is very cool technology and I think its just the learning curve that pisses people off. All things being equal a VVT cam will make more power down low and up top compared to a static grind of the same specs. Only issue seems to be working out the bugs and tuning them properly.
#22
we even returend to him the day after for more tunning
the result..

the denali was mad fast,shifting was perfect engine responded very fast we did 140+ mph and the motor keept going it actually shifted from 4th @ 6200 to 5th and even with an over drive gear it still has more
vvt rocks IF its done properly
but with the bigger cam shafts youll have to tune at least each 100rpms timing,f/a to get it rightthats what the tunner told us
#24
vvt rocks IF its done properly
I've also read that when you change cam timing it also changes fueling and ign timing as well so you have to work through all three together which sound like a MAJOR pitfa. What would be sweet is if you could simply set the cam timing and then A/F it and set the ign timing just like you would a static cam.
#26
As you can see from the GMHT test, the GM LS HOT cam makes decent power (around 520hp). GM installs that cam in its carb variant of the LS3, and it makes 515 HP with that cam. Adding more rocker ratio (like 1.8) should net you another 10-15HP, I would think.
With 1.8 rockers, it would have .554" lift, which is still less that what most LS3 cams are running now, which is around .600".
The intake ports on the stock heads stall at around .630" lift, from what I've read, so in theory you would want as much lift as possible up to about that point, bearing in mind that higher lifts kills vavle springs quicker, and there are some that say the stock LS rockers start to bind above .575", although there are tons of people running over .600".
I would say a cam with around 230 intake and 244 duration @ .050" and .600" lift, with 112-113 degree LSA and an aggressive lobe design, would be a good max effort street cam that will make over 550hp on an otherwise stock LS3/L92. But it will have a choppy idle and require tuning. Also, bear in mind the L92 has heavier valves that the LS3, so better springs are required to avoid valve float.
With 1.8 rockers, it would have .554" lift, which is still less that what most LS3 cams are running now, which is around .600".
The intake ports on the stock heads stall at around .630" lift, from what I've read, so in theory you would want as much lift as possible up to about that point, bearing in mind that higher lifts kills vavle springs quicker, and there are some that say the stock LS rockers start to bind above .575", although there are tons of people running over .600".
I would say a cam with around 230 intake and 244 duration @ .050" and .600" lift, with 112-113 degree LSA and an aggressive lobe design, would be a good max effort street cam that will make over 550hp on an otherwise stock LS3/L92. But it will have a choppy idle and require tuning. Also, bear in mind the L92 has heavier valves that the LS3, so better springs are required to avoid valve float.
#27
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




