PerformanceTrucks.net Forums

PerformanceTrucks.net Forums (https://www.performancetrucks.net/forums/)
-   GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion (https://www.performancetrucks.net/forums/gmt-800-older-gm-general-discussion-130/)
-   -   2011 Siverado 5.3, GAS MILEAGE (https://www.performancetrucks.net/forums/gmt-800-older-gm-general-discussion-130/2011-siverado-5-3-gas-mileage-489091/)

oldred95 09-22-2011 07:34 PM


Originally Posted by iregret (Post 4778055)
Was your 2000 2wd and your 2011 4wd?

I had a 2002 that consistently got 19-20mpg. Now I have a 2000 that gets 16.5mpg. The only difference between the two is the 2002 was 2wd and the 2000 is 4wd. I didn't realize it would make that much of a difference.

It really shouldn't make much more than 1-2 mpg difference if that. When in 2wd you are only spinning the CV axles and spider gears on the front diff due to the left CVs fixed engagement in the spider gears. The carrier itself should stay put unless its a 99 or 00 where the front shaft turned all the time. The 2002s seemed to be the cream of the crop for the NBS. Right out of the box those 5.3 T motors ran strong and got great mileage for a full sized truck. My 99 all stock was an absolute sloth compared to my dads 02 of the exact same specs and even with 2000+ pounds in the bed his still ran better than mine.

AKlowriderZ71 09-22-2011 10:58 PM

The 4x4's are higher in the air, that's one small ding on fuel economy. Also, many 4x4 owners end up putting on wheel/tire packages with much much more rolling resistance, and that's another ding on fuel economy. A big one actually.

ak2007r6 09-22-2011 11:01 PM

+1 on the motor breaking in. I just rolled over 14k on my 6.2 and have seen it go up 3-4 MPG from when I bought it. It's all about keeping your foot out of it though :)

AKlowriderZ71 09-22-2011 11:12 PM

^^^Nooooooo, it's your tune!! lol

Coban 09-22-2011 11:36 PM

I bet your mileage doesn't improve. Seriously.

ak2007r6 09-23-2011 12:40 AM


Originally Posted by AKlowriderZ71 (Post 4778665)
^^^Nooooooo, it's your tune!! lol

The tune and upgrading the intake tube was a noticeable difference for sure.

Originally Posted by Coban (Post 4778680)
I bet your mileage doesn't improve. Seriously.

Based on what??

chevz7102 09-24-2011 04:58 PM

My truck gets about 19-20 hwy 15 town. Im the winter its a diffrent story with 4x4 or auto 4x4 on then take away 2 mpg. 09 5.3l ccsb 4x4

rjwz28 09-26-2011 05:44 AM

12 city, 16-17 highway with my tuned 2011 CCSB 6.2 3.73 4x4 leveled on 33s with 13k miles.

ak2007r6 09-26-2011 02:18 PM


Originally Posted by rjwz28 (Post 4780173)
12 city, 16-17 highway with my tuned 2011 CCSB 6.2 3.73 4x4 leveled on 33s with 13k miles.

Be just a little lighter on the foot and those numbers will go up :)

rjwz28 09-26-2011 03:59 PM

Not much. City yes, but I drove 2500 miles all highway at 75mph and averaged about 16.5mpg. Those tires really kill it.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:38 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands