1999-06 4.8 and 5.3 Ls engines and longevity?
#11
MASS seller approved
iTrader: (19)
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
From: Hampton bays, new york
If u r going to do a swap then I would go to the 6.0 . The 4.8 to 5.3 seems hardly worth it. Either way u will be swapping the engine and whether a 5.3 or a 6.0 it's the same amount of work, why not get a little more power out of the swap. I think any of the LS motors will do it's all about preference.
#16
If you asked me, I'd tell you to keep your eyes open for a 2005-2006 L33 aluminum block 5.3 liter. They were the "H.O. 5.3" and have a 10:1 compression ratio, better heads(799 or 243), LS2 timing set, LS2 rods, LS7 lifters, etc. I found mine at a salvage yard for $900 complete. 
All of your old stuff will bolt directly on.

All of your old stuff will bolt directly on.
#18
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
From: Southern IL
LQ9 or LQ4. L33 is aluminum, and all the short or long blocks I've seen, the aluminum(L33, LS1, LS6) almost always cost more. I have an L33 with 126xxx on it. Only trouble I've had was a valve guide seal, and lifters that wouldn't pump up(hence the 243's and LS7 lifters in my sig). My truck really needs lower gears, and even with the 3.42's, and 285/70 mud terrains, it pulls good, and averages 18.5 to 19 mpg.







