ZO6Ted

Awesome! Torque is king. Had 2 identical trucks '65 Chevy rcsb's with 350's. The one with the 280 cam felt stronger. The one with the 270 cam would kick its *** at the track.

sam5300

iTrader: (1)

I like this build, good useable truck that makes good useable power.

Driver311

iTrader: (1)

Got a tbss intake manifold/90mm tb, 36lb injectors and clips on the way. Hoping for another 20whp out of it. That would put me just under 400whp. Not to shabby for a mild cammed bolt on lq9.

SnakeOiler

iTrader: (6)

What was the duty cycle on the stock injectors during the dyno?

Driver311

iTrader: (1)

99-100% basically past 5k

ssswannabe

Awesome numbers! how much low end torque would you lose with the 228? I have an lq9 and was considering the tsp228.

Mikey 97Z M6

iTrader: (35)

Looking forward to seeing the numbers after the intake swap.

Mike

badboy956

Nice build bud...

Driver311

iTrader: (1)

I don't recommend doing it. I have no doubt in my mind mod for mod the 220 cam will outrun and out truck the 228. Trucks need trq and the 228 loses to much. I didn't like what I lost from the 220. Truck just wont be near as fun with the 228. Now if you are building a scsb 2wd for the track maybe. But its a truck and the 220 in my eyes is the perfect cam for dual purpose. I still use my truck and this cam brings smiles all day. Cant argue with my dyno graph, and the way it feels is about perfect. Ill post the new numbers after injectrors and intake manifold. 400whp 400ftlbs is the goal.

sam5300

iTrader: (1)

What is the idle like? Is it pretty noticeable?