Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LM7 to L92 swap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-03-2018, 08:32 AM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
codered161's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Goldthwaite,Tx
Posts: 134
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default LM7 to L92 swap

I have a 2006 Sierra 4x4 I am thinking about dropping in a L92 out of a 2007 Yukon. I have read several posts and some say it’s pretty well a simple drop in with minimal changes needed, others make it seem like rocket science. I will be leaving my 4L60e in to begin with but would like to know what all it would take to swap in a 6L80e later on. Some posts I read were saying you can use your 5.3 wiring harness and ECM but some were saying otherwise. I would love to hear from someone who has done one of these swaps.
Old 09-03-2018, 11:12 AM
  #2  
TECH Apprentice
 
swathdiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Treasure Coast of Florida
Posts: 378
Received 49 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Different generations and that means different computers, sensors, crankshafts, wire harnesses, etc. It can be done but at what expense? Stick with an LQ9.
Old 09-03-2018, 01:05 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
codered161's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Goldthwaite,Tx
Posts: 134
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by swathdiver
Different generations and that means different computers, sensors, crankshafts, wire harnesses, etc. It can be done but at what expense? Stick with an LQ9.
Thanks for the input. I’ll look into the LQ9. Would a LQ9 swap right in and be able to use the wiring harnesses and ECM?

Last edited by codered161; 09-03-2018 at 01:18 PM.
Old 09-03-2018, 05:51 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
FFDP's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Rogers, MN
Posts: 5,189
Received 546 Likes on 472 Posts
Default

Yes, the LQ9 is the same GEN 3 style engine with the same 24/1x crank trigger. The newer engines are 58/4x.

You could swap the reluctor wheel, change the camshaft and camshaft gear, extend the knock sensor harness and a bunch of other stuff but it's a pain. Using a 6L80e would require the newer E38 computer as well, which none of that would be the same on your truck. None of your gauges or anything could talk with the can-bus E38 computer.
Old 09-03-2018, 08:34 PM
  #5  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
codered161's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Goldthwaite,Tx
Posts: 134
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FFDP
Yes, the LQ9 is the same GEN 3 style engine with the same 24/1x crank trigger. The newer engines are 58/4x.

You could swap the reluctor wheel, change the camshaft and camshaft gear, extend the knock sensor harness and a bunch of other stuff but it's a pain. Using a 6L80e would require the newer E38 computer as well, which none of that would be the same on your truck. None of your gauges or anything could talk with the can-bus E38 computer.
Im guessing the LQ9 would be the easier route then. Would there be a big difference between the lq4 and the LQ9? I see it’s about 35-40hp but from what I have read that’s mostly in the tune? I also read where if you go with a lq4 to go with a 2005+. I have a 5.3l and recently put a tsp 212/218 low lift cam, tsp lt headers with ORY, CAI and got a dyno tune, I never received a print out but the guy says it’s putting 308 to the rear wheels. I’m skeptical, it does have more power but I’m not satisfied and I don’t think it’s pumping out over 300hp.
Old 09-03-2018, 08:43 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
FFDP's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Rogers, MN
Posts: 5,189
Received 546 Likes on 472 Posts
Default

It's calibration and the compression ratio if I recall correctly.

Finding an LQ9 is harder than the standard LQ4 because the LQ4 was used in way more vehicles. A simple cam swap would gain you 30-50hp easy in the LQ4. It wouldn't even have to be anything crazy, a small cam that kept the stock stall converter would give the 6.0 a good power bump.
Old 09-03-2018, 09:28 PM
  #7  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
codered161's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Goldthwaite,Tx
Posts: 134
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FFDP
It's calibration and the compression ratio if I recall correctly.

Finding an LQ9 is harder than the standard LQ4 because the LQ4 was used in way more vehicles. A simple cam swap would gain you 30-50hp easy in the LQ4. It wouldn't even have to be anything crazy, a small cam that kept the stock stall converter would give the 6.0 a good power bump.
how about the tsp 212/218 low lift? Would that be better than the stock cam? If I end up doing the swap and that cam will work I will pull it out of my 5.3 and just put the stock cam back in and use that engine in my 85 Silverado.
Old 09-03-2018, 09:42 PM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
FFDP's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Rogers, MN
Posts: 5,189
Received 546 Likes on 472 Posts
Default

Yeah it would work in a 6.0 just fine, it's better than the stock cam for sure.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lvz2ryd
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
1
06-14-2018 12:36 AM
97 Z Me Go
GM Parts Classifieds
6
11-22-2009 08:57 PM
xdanny510x
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
22
07-26-2008 01:27 PM
xdanny510x
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
3
01-14-2008 08:41 AM
Ryan23silverado
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
5
03-17-2003 05:44 AM



Quick Reply: LM7 to L92 swap



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:43 AM.