Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Dyno Results (Baseline/Stock run)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-13-2004, 02:31 PM
  #1  
what a rush!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
moregrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 17,610
Received 28 Likes on 20 Posts
Default Dyno Results (Baseline/Stock run)

This my 05 2500HD 6.0 4l80E 10.5" Rear Diff

1st my speed limiter kicked in at 92mph/4600rpms in third. I believe I made highest #'s in second gear.

(all figures SAE corrected)

AFR 14.7-1
244.70 rwhp
323.90 rwtq

that's what she did with 825 miles on her
Old 11-13-2004, 02:42 PM
  #2  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (7)
 
BigBlockChev572's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by moregrip
This my 05 2500HD 6.0 4l80E 10.5" Rear Diff

1st my speed limiter kicked in at 92mph/4600rpms in third. I believe I made highest #'s in second gear.
(all figures corrected)

AFR 14.7-1
244.7 rwhp
323.9 rwtq

that's what she did with 825 miles on her
Gotta love that rear wheel torque number!
Congrats!
Philip S.
Old 11-13-2004, 02:44 PM
  #3  
TECH Regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sacramento California
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Very nice. Your speed limiter kick in at 92??? I thought they kicked in at 98.
Old 11-13-2004, 02:48 PM
  #4  
TECH Apprentice
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Thousand Oaks, Ca
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

i think my 04 kicks in at 98 but then slows my *** way down and lets go and i can accelerate back up to 98 where it does it again, so maybe its slowing him down to 92?.

PS I thought these were just supposed to go to the limiter and stay there.
Old 11-13-2004, 02:54 PM
  #5  
what a rush!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
moregrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 17,610
Received 28 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

It started pulling timing at 4600 rpms @ 92.2 mph and I was making 235rwhp/ on the up curve.
By 4800 rpms I was going 96.4 mph and making 198 rwhp.
Old 11-13-2004, 03:11 PM
  #6  
what a rush!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
moregrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 17,610
Received 28 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BigBlockChev572
Gotta love that rear wheel torque number!
Congrats!
Philip S.
Yeah, I'm pretty happy with the rwtq

Thanks for the congrats.
Old 11-13-2004, 04:22 PM
  #7  
TECH Veteran
 
Mr. Sandog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sun Diego
Posts: 4,632
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Excellent run grippy....especially that TQ number. As we know, TQ is where it's at.
Old 11-13-2004, 04:57 PM
  #8  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (6)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North of HotLanta,GA
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

how come the new speedos go to 120 but cut off is 92
Old 11-13-2004, 05:04 PM
  #9  
blownerator
iTrader: (20)
 
BlownChevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1986
Location: Chatsworth, CA
Posts: 18,745
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tdogg5.3
how come the new speedos go to 120 but cut off is 92

Feds


I has more to do with what the tires on the vehicle are rated at.
Old 11-13-2004, 05:06 PM
  #10  
PSM
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
PSM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by tdogg5.3
how come the new speedos go to 120 but cut off is 92

Tires are only rated for around 98mph I believe. If you sold a vehicle that could go faster than its tires were rated for.... you'd have a nasty lawsuit. Not to mention it's probably illegal


Quick Reply: Dyno Results (Baseline/Stock run)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:10 PM.