GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Cat failure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 9, 2009 | 09:52 PM
  #11  
Parke10's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,232
Likes: 1
From: Bakersfield,Ca
Default

why not just leave the cats off and fudge the smog?
Reply
Old May 9, 2009 | 10:49 PM
  #12  
terravast4's Avatar
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,181
Likes: 342
From: Austin, TX
Default

where did you have them mounted at? When my exhaust guy saw my stainlessworks y-pipe he told me I should not have the cats mounted right after the LT collector or they were sure to burn up. On my new set-up both cats were placed after the trans x-member.
Reply
Old May 9, 2009 | 10:52 PM
  #13  
terravast4's Avatar
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,181
Likes: 342
From: Austin, TX
Default

those sure do look metallic to me . It seems like the ceramic would just break up???
Reply
Old May 9, 2009 | 11:04 PM
  #14  
terravast4's Avatar
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,181
Likes: 342
From: Austin, TX
Default

I did a search on that part number and they are in fact a metallic substrate. The 54959 are also rated for the same displacement but with a ceramic substrate. I chose these specifically because of my experience with the stainlessworks metallic substrate material.
Reply
Old May 9, 2009 | 11:47 PM
  #15  
EVILGMC's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (47)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,715
Likes: 0
From: 714
Default

i was referenced the jegs website....just looked at the magnaflow site. i stand corrected. i had metallics. looks like its time to try ceramic. only thing i do not like is that they are only rated for ~5 liters. i am 6.1 and blown....hmmmm
Reply
Old May 9, 2009 | 11:50 PM
  #16  
EVILGMC's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (47)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,715
Likes: 0
From: 714
Default

they were mounted at the header collectors
Reply
Old May 10, 2009 | 12:12 AM
  #17  
terravast4's Avatar
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,181
Likes: 342
From: Austin, TX
Default

I am kinda confused. I did some research and I also have the 59959 and bought them from jegs and i have a ceramic substrate and are rated for 6.2l at 6000lbs. Jegs says ceramic and online says "revolutionary metalic substrate". I wonder if they changed the design of this model. I know I chose the 6.2 rating for my blown application and they are in fact ceramic as I checked before the install. Hmmm.
Reply
Old May 10, 2009 | 08:53 AM
  #18  
budhayes3's Avatar
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 2
From: Hackensack, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by terravast4
where did you have them mounted at? When my exhaust guy saw my stainlessworks y-pipe he told me I should not have the cats mounted right after the LT collector or they were sure to burn up. On my new set-up both cats were placed after the trans x-member.
Actually you want a cat converter as far forward as possible if you want it to work properly, it needs to heat up. I have been running the SW's and catted y-pipe for a few years now with no problems, but my setup is mild and I'm not boosted. Seems like these cats don't like boosted applications.
Reply
Old May 10, 2009 | 09:45 AM
  #19  
EVILGMC's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (47)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,715
Likes: 0
From: 714
Default

Originally Posted by Parke10
why not just leave the cats off and fudge the smog?
if you get caught the VIN is branded a gross polluter and there are big fines. its not worth it.
Reply
Old May 10, 2009 | 09:47 AM
  #20  
EVILGMC's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (47)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,715
Likes: 0
From: 714
Default

Originally Posted by terravast4
I am kinda confused. I did some research and I also have the 59959 and bought them from jegs and i have a ceramic substrate and are rated for 6.2l at 6000lbs. Jegs says ceramic and online says "revolutionary metalic substrate". I wonder if they changed the design of this model. I know I chose the 6.2 rating for my blown application and they are in fact ceramic as I checked before the install. Hmmm.

i am going to call magnaflow tomorrow. there is a definite discrepancy between the magnaflow and jegs websites.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:22 AM.