FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Mikegyver, part 9, pics.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 27, 2006 | 10:01 PM
  #1  
MikeGyver's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,515
Likes: 242
From: Suburban Chicago
Default Mikegyver, part 9, pics.

I made the compressor-to-intercooler tube today. This intercooler is going to work so well, I've already put my Snow Boost Cooler up for sale. (Check the classifieds)
http://homepage.mac.com/michaeldritz/PhotoAlbum12.html
Reply
Old May 27, 2006 | 10:12 PM
  #2  
03sierraslt's Avatar
Admin
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,007
Likes: 221
From: Western PA
Default

Looks good man, I cant wait to see the results. TimZ talked my *** into getting in gear to finish my intercooler.... haha
Reply
Old May 28, 2006 | 09:02 AM
  #3  
chopperbrent's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Land of Lincoln
Default

Looks killer man , great job !
Reply
Old May 28, 2006 | 10:29 AM
  #4  
Whippled 496's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 1
From: Lake Shore, MD
Default

lookin good.....are you going to have any before and after IAT readings for comparison?
Reply
Old May 28, 2006 | 10:49 AM
  #5  
MikeGyver's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,515
Likes: 242
From: Suburban Chicago
Default

Thanks, boys. Yeah, I'll have before and after, but they're going to be about a year apart, LOL!
Reply
Old May 28, 2006 | 12:30 PM
  #6  
James B.'s Avatar
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 3
From: 33.91° -117.48°
Default

How close are you to finishing? I am very interrested to hear of your results with this.
Me and a few other people discussed this, in what turned into a multi-page thread, over at PPE's forum a few years back. The guy who was doing it bought all the parts but never did come around to starting the fabrication. This was on a 5.7L Vortec.
The front-mount intercooler is almost impossible to heat-soak like an air-to-water one is since effective air-flow over it and heat exchange increases as MPH does unlike a water-cooled unit where capacity is fixed by the GPH rating of the pump.
The only one concern we ever did come up with was the discrepencies that would arrise between MAF and MAP during throttle transitions. For example, closing the throttle after WOT. MAF would drop faster than MAP. It could go lean right there. The flip side is stabbing the trottle from idle, MAF will rise sharply and MAP will lag behind slightly as the I/C and plumbing build pressure. This could make it lean right there. We tried to calculate it in various different ways but could not come up with any solid figures of what to expect. One possibility is locating the MAF/IAT sensor in between the intercooler and the throttle body flange on the intake manifold. They do work under boost and having the temp sensor right there has the additional benefit of letting you tune in maximum advance with temperature-compensated retard because you will have the exact charge temp to tune for.

I've got a decision to make with my own setup. I have a little 1.6L compressor and it's too small for the 383. I can only get 7psi out of it with a 2.5" pulley. I figure if I'm going to the trouble of custom adapting a 2.3L compressor to this I should just as well figure out how to intercool it. I already know that a air-water adaptation works but if your setup works well I'll be leaning that way!

(EDITED for missing verbage)

Thanks

Last edited by James B.; May 28, 2006 at 11:17 PM.
Reply
Old May 28, 2006 | 02:39 PM
  #7  
MikeGyver's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,515
Likes: 242
From: Suburban Chicago
Default

I only have a full day or so left, so sometime before July, LOL.
I think that you think that my throttle is after the intercooler. As it is now, if I were to locate the MAF/IAT in between the throttle and I/C, it would be reading the hot air from the compressor. Or is this what you want? I have already relocated the IAT to the manifold, after I run it with the I/C, I might have to move it to the cold air pipe. I don't want to read the compressor discharge air, it will retard the timing. So are you suggesting to move the MAF to the hot air tube, which is down stream of the throttle, or between the I/C and the engine?
EDIT: I reread your post and I think you're saying to put the MAF as close to the MAP as possible, which would be between the I/C and engine.
Do you really think that there will be that much lag?
Reply
Old May 28, 2006 | 05:20 PM
  #8  
MikeGyver's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,515
Likes: 242
From: Suburban Chicago
Default See What I Mean...

I went to put the trans cooler line back into the radiator, and the end broke off in my hand. This is why "one day's" work takes me a month.
Reply
Old May 28, 2006 | 06:12 PM
  #9  
03sierraslt's Avatar
Admin
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,007
Likes: 221
From: Western PA
Default

As far as the MAF I was thinking of putting mine between the intercooler and the intake manifold. Currently it is between the air filter and the blower ( Basically stock position however I feel that the best place with the intercooler on would be between the intercooler and the engine. Does this sound correct, I see no reason why it wouldnt?
Reply
Old May 28, 2006 | 10:16 PM
  #10  
Whippled 496's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 1
From: Lake Shore, MD
Default

good question, that way i wouldnt need to tap the whipple output elbow and cut any MAF wires.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:32 PM.