FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Help building for boost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 06:35 PM
  #11  
Summitwhite06's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Default

I haven't actually put the cam in yet. I just have it sitting in the garage. What all will I need to add when I install it? Push rods? valve springs? I was checkin out parts on thunderracing.com and I'm not sure what to get

edit: I think I'm just going to ditch the cam I have and go with a new kit. What size cam would be right for my setup?

Last edited by Summitwhite06; Dec 23, 2010 at 06:48 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 06:41 PM
  #12  
KDavis04ss's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
From: Brunswick, GA
Default

damn nice ride. good luck with the setup
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 06:50 PM
  #13  
Summitwhite06's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 04SilverCrew
Badass ride bro! Nothing better than a white truck all clean of decals and trim... finished off with chrome wheels. Looks great.
Originally Posted by KDavis04ss
damn nice ride. good luck with the setup
Thanks guys!
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 07:10 PM
  #14  
Summitwhite06's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Default

The 220/220 lsa114 has the biggest negative overlap of all the cams offered in the thunderracing kit. Would that be a good choice?
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2010 | 08:46 AM
  #15  
Summitwhite06's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Default

Or would a GT2-3 cam be better for boost in my 4.8?
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2010 | 09:11 AM
  #16  
AndysC3's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,884
Likes: 10
From: Minot, ND
Default

Quite a few people run the gt 2-3 with great results. I think it would perform better than the tr 220 in a boosted truck.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2010 | 10:43 AM
  #17  
TXBlownTBSS's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: McAllen, TX
Default

That's not enough cam... stock cam or a Leading Edge Performance stage 1 blower cam. That cam is proven to make the power. Im running 12psi on a stock bottom end, stock heads, and stock cam and making over 650 to the wheels... If you are staying at moderately low boost levels, (below 8psi) your stock bottom end will hold as long as your tune is good.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2010 | 11:07 AM
  #18  
AndysC3's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,884
Likes: 10
From: Minot, ND
Default

for a 6.0 it may not be enough, but the op has a 4.8.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2010 | 04:17 PM
  #19  
Summitwhite06's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by AndysC3
Quite a few people run the gt 2-3 with great results. I think it would perform better than the tr 220 in a boosted truck.
I want one that will help get all the power I can out of the blower but not be too aggressive. This is for a DD after all. The gt2-3 will cost a little more but if it's worth it I'll get it.

Originally Posted by TXBlownTBSS
That's not enough cam... stock cam or a Leading Edge Performance stage 1 blower cam. That cam is proven to make the power. Im running 12psi on a stock bottom end, stock heads, and stock cam and making over 650 to the wheels... If you are staying at moderately low boost levels, (below 8psi) your stock bottom end will hold as long as your tune is good.
That's way too extreme for what I need.

Originally Posted by AndysC3
for a 6.0 it may not be enough, but the op has a 4.8.
Exactly. If I can get at least 400 hp to the wheels I'll be happy. I don't think that's asking for too much
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2010 | 05:06 PM
  #20  
1Bear's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 8
From: Jones Creek, Texas
Default

Could my engine produce more power with a different camshaft, quite possibly? However, for a daily driver that runs 12.04 with what everyone says is the too small Radix MP-112 and 11.67 with a 75 shot in a 5650lb behemoth, all the while idling silky smooth and being gentle on the valve-springs, I don’t know that I would go so far as saying it’s too small. Maybe too small for max performance, and maybe too small for a supercharger that could push a little more air, but I don’t feel it’s too small for the 112 that’s doing all it can. And I know mine isn’t a fluke, as there are a few that are running similar times with basically the same set-up. Too bad the GT-7 is no longer available, as it showed promise as well and Roger’s (KySilverado) truck also ran almost identical times. I know the LS9 has comparable enough spec’s that Lingenfelter dropped the GT-7 as a cost savings, but due to the amount of effort and money it would take to convert to the Gen IV style timing components, front cover with CPS and the extension harness that is also required, I don’t see where it’s really the best choice for a Gen III equipped vehicle. Now if the OP had a lighter weight vehicle with smaller wheels and tires, with a larger more radical combination, I could see going with a more aggressive camshaft, but as it stands, I feel the GT2-3 should work as well in his as it does in everyone else’s. Another good thing about the mild GT2-3 is that while it will set you back a little purchasing it new, you will be able to run the LS6 valve-springs and could get away with the stock pushrods as well if you desired. Better pushrods are always a nice upgrade when you increase spring pressure or extend the operating range of an engine, but at this level it’s not 100% necessary either.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:09 AM.