FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Boost Cam

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 13, 2013 | 09:24 PM
  #21  
Atomic's Avatar
I have a gauge for that
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,282
Likes: 438
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

With the backpressure a vast majority of the setups here have I would select a cam with single duration or a very small exhaust bias. I had a 226/226 on a 117 and loved it. Now I have a 230/233 114 and its a bit pickier but acts like a more aggressive cam, which it is. A huge exhaust bias will just hurt you with a turbo.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2013 | 10:53 PM
  #22  
graysilverado5.3's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Atomic
With the backpressure a vast majority of the setups here have I would select a cam with single duration or a very small exhaust bias. I had a 226/226 on a 117 and loved it. Now I have a 230/233 114 and its a bit pickier but acts like a more aggressive cam, which it is. A huge exhaust bias will just hurt you with a turbo.
Im with you on the exhaust bias. Ran a 212/218 114lsa then switched to a isky 218/218 112lsa and I definatly could tell a difference between both. Truck pulled much better with the single duration cam.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2013 | 11:07 PM
  #23  
shifty89's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Atomic
With the backpressure a vast majority of the setups here have I would select a cam with single duration or a very small exhaust bias. I had a 226/226 on a 117 and loved it. Now I have a 230/233 114 and its a bit pickier but acts like a more aggressive cam, which it is. A huge exhaust bias will just hurt you with a turbo.
Assuming a truck had a charger with a turbine that actually flowed a little, would you think an exhaust bias would be beneficial? Asking because you run one with a good turbine.

I run a triple 212, asking for the sake of curiosity and informational posts.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2013 | 01:36 AM
  #24  
Iconoclast's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Default

Thank you for the explanation.
Im torn here lol..Im going to assume the triple 12 would make more TQ down low..This will not be a track truck, its a go out and have as much fun as possible on the street truck.
...but a..say 228/228 .571/.571 112LSA would sound a lot better, but there goes my TQ.

*****
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2013 | 03:49 AM
  #25  
gamble686's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 3
From: Arizona
Default

Go with the TU1 cam from speed inc. it is proven to do awesome in a 5.3 and its a little bigger. 225/225 honestly the exact 5.3 turbo cam I want down the road.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2013 | 06:20 AM
  #26  
Atomic's Avatar
I have a gauge for that
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,282
Likes: 438
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

Originally Posted by shifty89
Assuming a truck had a charger with a turbine that actually flowed a little, would you think an exhaust bias would be beneficial? Asking because you run one with a good turbine.

I run a triple 212, asking for the sake of curiosity and informational posts.
Same story, my setup still has a backpressure ratio of close to 2:1. Most peoples are probably around 2.5-3.

You want more exhaust duration because the exhaust port usually flows a good bit less than the intake port, however with a turbo the exhaust is much hotter and therefor is more motivated to get out of the port, so you dont need as much duration. With a supercharger, you will want a bigger split.

I wouldnt consider backpressure a non-issue until the backpressure was 1.5 or better.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2013 | 06:26 AM
  #27  
slowec's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,062
Likes: 0
From: Brunswick, Ga
Default

torn on a 212 ...

get a 215/215 and never think about a cam again. IMO
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2013 | 05:12 PM
  #28  
Iconoclast's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Default

I think i might get the TU1.5
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2013 | 06:57 PM
  #29  
Beatdown Z's Avatar
Laid Back
15 Year Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 10
From: Newark, DE
Default

Do it!!!!!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
2500ZL1
8-Lug Truck Performance
60
Jan 25, 2016 06:30 AM
Silveradorst07
FORCED INDUCTION
65
Dec 31, 2015 12:04 AM
urdone
FORCED INDUCTION
10
Aug 18, 2015 12:17 PM
JordanH
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
9
Aug 8, 2015 07:59 PM
Jake99
FORCED INDUCTION
18
Aug 8, 2015 07:56 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:55 PM.