Sdpc 5.3vvt dyno results
#1
Trucks Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: LUBBOCK T.X.
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sdpc 5.3vvt dyno results UPDATES W/PICS
OK GUYS HERE ARE PICS OF THE TRUCK WITH THE HARRIS SPEED WORKS PLATE KIT ITS ONLY HARD MOUNTED FOR NOW SHOULD BE WIRED THIS WEEKEND RAN OUT OF TIME THIS PAST WEEKEND....HOPING TO HIT IT WITH A 100 SHOT NOTHING CRAZY....WILL POST MORE RESULTS AS THEY COME..
Ok guys SDPC has been working on our 2010 silverado 5.3 upgrades are listed below with the dyno sheet....
heads ( stock) w/ls6 springs
stock bottom end
dod delete
pacesetter long tubes
off-road y-pipe
fast 102mm truck intake stock t/b
powerbond underdrive pulley
kn cold air intake
tuned
magnaflow cat back
vvt comp cam custom grind 218/222 .560/.566 lift 115lsa
dyno is on 22" wheels
Ok guys SDPC has been working on our 2010 silverado 5.3 upgrades are listed below with the dyno sheet....
heads ( stock) w/ls6 springs
stock bottom end
dod delete
pacesetter long tubes
off-road y-pipe
fast 102mm truck intake stock t/b
powerbond underdrive pulley
kn cold air intake
tuned
magnaflow cat back
vvt comp cam custom grind 218/222 .560/.566 lift 115lsa
dyno is on 22" wheels
Last edited by Sales2@SDPC; 05-16-2011 at 05:22 PM.
#3
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
Not bad for a 5.3 and 22s but a bit disappointing when you compare this dyno sheet to a 6.2 dyno sheet. Don't get me wrong the 351hp 320tq is respectable but cam headers and the work to be swapping lifters and the money alone for all these mods I would rather find me a used 6.2 and swap it out and make the same numbers with a stock motor and still have all the potential to make more power.
#4
LS1TECH & Trucks Sponsor
iTrader: (33)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 3,324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not bad for a 5.3 and 22s but a bit disappointing when you compare this dyno sheet to a 6.2 dyno sheet. Don't get me wrong the 351hp 320tq is respectable but cam headers and the work to be swapping lifters and the money alone for all these mods I would rather find me a used 6.2 and swap it out and make the same numbers with a stock motor and still have all the potential to make more power.
#5
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
Oh yeah don't get me wrong I have seen the potential of a bolt on 5.3 and I think it's badass that your putting those kind of numbers and improving on GMs most common engine. Alot of people won't go through the trouble to swap a motor or just can't and are left with the 5.3 to work with. Thus going the route you guys are taking and spend money to make that motor perform... I was just saying my opinion in what route I would take givin the same amount of work and funds. You guys are doing great don't let what I said take anything away from that.
Last edited by Three6GMC; 05-02-2011 at 04:35 PM.
#7
Trucks Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: LUBBOCK T.X.
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We are figuring about a 40 hp gain on just the cam to the wheels. As for grinds i can do just about what ever you have in mind all i have to do is call a custom grind is really no more than a off shelf grind...