Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Graphs | Power Comparisons | Dyno Truck List

Relatively stock Nissan VK56VD dyno

Old 04-05-2017, 06:23 AM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
madmann26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Somewhere north of 285, south of 985.
Posts: 2,987
Received 371 Likes on 299 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fast355
I finally saw a dyno video of one and it put down 310 at the tire bone stock and something like 340 ft/lbs of torque.

I just changed up the exhaust on the M56. Removed the secondary cats, factory Y, resonators, and rear mufflers. Dual 2.5" from the manifold cats, to a X pipe where the factory pipes split after the Y into the resonators, then magnaflow magnapaks where the resonators once were and 2.5" pipes to the factory exhaust tips I cut off the factory mufflers and opened up enough to fit the 2.5" pipes. Sounds VERY mean now and power is up across the whole rpm range. I have not even touched the tune yet but I got on it on an on-ramp that I usually can hit 70 mph by a specific marker in the road and was doing nearly 80 mph when I hit that point. It is up a good 40+ hp from exhaust work alone. Will get another dyno someday soon to know where it stands but it pulls very noticeably harder, especially in the 2,500-6,500 rpm range. Even part throttle kickdown at 70 with the tach at 2,500 rpm it pulls noticeably more responsively. This 11.5:1 5.6 loves to breathe and the factory straw like exhaust was just not cutting it. I left room at the rear where the factory mufflers were to add vibrant resonators or a pair of 14" large case magnaflows to tame it down even more but at this point I love the sound even if it is a bit loud and aggressive. I kept hearing how much low-end torque it would lose, but it knocks the back tires off practically at will through first gear and I am running taller/wider than stock P275/40R20s on the back.





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vIRBIR19A1o

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUAP5UjgWxg

Stalking and being a predator is illegal in 50 states. If I ever caught someone taking pictures of the underneath of my vehicle, castle doctrine is in full effect.
Old 04-09-2017, 09:53 AM
  #12  
Teching In
iTrader: (3)
 
Auburn247's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Appleton Wisconsin
Posts: 35
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Those before and after pics of the walnut blasting look an awful like the ones I saw over on the Silverado/Sierra forum awhile back.
Old 04-10-2017, 07:34 PM
  #13  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Euless, TX
Posts: 614
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Auburn247
Those before and after pics of the walnut blasting look an awful like the ones I saw over on the Silverado/Sierra forum awhile back.
Never knew they built a Gas GM truck with 4 valves per cylinder....Learn something new everyday!!!

I know they don't but just saying!
Old 04-10-2017, 07:47 PM
  #14  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
madmann26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Somewhere north of 285, south of 985.
Posts: 2,987
Received 371 Likes on 299 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fast355
Never knew they built a Gas GM truck with 4 valves per cylinder....Learn something new everyday!!!

I know they don't but just saying!
Actually it wasn't a truck.

It was the original LT5 engine, aka, ZR1. It was used in the Corvette from 1990-1995.

Take that **** somewhere else.
The following users liked this post:
Auburn247 (04-10-2017)
Old 04-11-2017, 03:23 AM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Euless, TX
Posts: 614
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by madmann26
Actually it wasn't a truck.

It was the original LT5 engine, aka, ZR1. It was used in the Corvette from 1990-1995.

Take that **** somewhere else.
Those engines are traditional port fuel injection and do not suffer the same carbon buildup a direct injected engine like my M56 does. So you sir take that **** out of my thread!!!
Old 06-15-2017, 05:18 PM
  #16  
TECH Apprentice
 
Boost-freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: saudi arabia
Posts: 320
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Auburn247
Those before and after pics of the walnut blasting look an awful like the ones I saw over on the Silverado/Sierra forum awhile back.
yup i have seen it in elite engineering catch can thread , it's horrible for a 10k miles truck

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:47 PM.