Is this good or bad? 5.3 417whp/401tq
1999gmc Sierra 2wd
5.3 tr220 -112lsa milled 862 heads .032 efans long tubes ORY magna charger mp122 - 8 psi 3000 stall 3:42 gears he ran it high which I was fearful of--- 3rd locked converter to 6k 417.2 hp @ 6050 rpms 153mph 401.6 tq @ 4658 rpms 115 mphhttps://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.per...8d139d9f00.jpg https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.per...21f080afe3.jpg |
I'd say for only 8 PSI you're doing well on a 5.3. Other than not wanting to spin the driveshaft too fast, I would say there is power in spinning it higher. I can't imagine youre anywhere near max RPM of that 122. It's funny that your TQ peaks as late as it does for a blower that's not all that rev happy.
Where are your shifts set to in your tune? let that thing show you 6300 RPM. It's not done climbing at 6050. |
That's what I told the guy it shifts at in 2-3 (6250)
1-2 is 6450 ive been wanting to pulley down but I worried of lifting a head (stock bolts) who knows I might throw it at it anyways 11-12 psi if I can get the right pulley (got any laying around?) i was thrown off by the torque, I thought it would be higher |
19-20 psi on stock gaskets and head bolts here
|
Stock head bolts should be the last thing you fear here.
I say you pulley down. Youre safe with more boost on the stock compression of a 5.3 even on pump gas. 10PSI revved to your shift point will make some nice power! I bet you'd be approaching 500 at the tires and your torque would only come in harder down low. |
Originally Posted by Vortec350ss
(Post 5420857)
Stock head bolts should be the last thing you fear here.
I say you pulley down. Youre safe with more boost on the stock compression of a 5.3 even on pump gas. 10PSI revved to your shift point will make some nice power! I bet you'd be approaching 500 at the tires and your torque would only come in harder down low. you have any extra pulleys laying around for a mp? I'm running the 3.1 now- 19-20psi holy crap - I thought anything higher that 15 your asking for problems (other than ring lands popping) |
If I could figure out how to load a video not using Photobucket... meh
so i guess he did run to 6400 @164mph ... wonder why the graph didn't recordhttps://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.per...5d13de5012.pngThis is a snap shot |
|
Says 428/411 at the bottom of the sheet. Not bad at all!
|
Originally Posted by ZO6Ted
(Post 5421042)
Says 428/411 at the bottom of the sheet. Not bad at all!
thanks so which is the correct number to look at then? 417 on the one sheet with the corrected # (which I don't think is right to go off of) then this 428 max you pointed out |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:48 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands