Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Graphs | Power Comparisons | Dyno Truck List

'09 5.3 on the dyno again

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 7, 2010 | 01:23 PM
  #31  
ForcedTQ's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
From: Northern CA
Exclamation

Originally Posted by LS1FREEK
The new 5.3's have flat top pistons but they also went from 61cc heads (most 99-06) to 64cc on the new (07 up) 243/799 heads. So in all reality, they did not gain any compression.
Actually, if you read a little bit, you will see that the flat top pistons difference in volume from the dished pistons volume is greater than the 3cc gain in combustion chamber volume. Hence the .5 point increase in static compression ratio from 9.4 to 9.9. They Do Gain Compression, the L33's and new LY5's (the 5.3's in the 2007+ NNBS trucks) that is.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2010 | 02:47 PM
  #32  
LSwonderfull's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ForcedTQ
Actually, if you read a little bit, you will see that the flat top pistons difference in volume from the dished pistons volume is greater than the 3cc gain in combustion chamber volume. Hence the .5 point increase in static compression ratio from 9.4 to 9.9. They Do Gain Compression, the L33's and new LY5's (the 5.3's in the 2007+ NNBS trucks) that is.
Exactly, i was just ready to comment about that , its in the flat top design and conservative crevice volume of the newer 5.3 pistons. My opinion is that the .5 point in compression is almost as important as the flow gains of 243 heads over the previous 5.3 castings. The chamber of the 243 is somewhat shrouded by the small 5.3 bore. Not sure how much that hurts gains...
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2010 | 08:56 AM
  #33  
KHester84's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 204
Likes: 1
From: Lafayette, LA
Default

I was thinking about a turbo system in my '08 5.3, but after seeing these results this is very impressive and costs a whole lot less! Do you think that cam is too big for an extended cab z71? I'm looking to have at least 350hp daily driven. Don't mean to hijack the thread guys.

Keith

Last edited by KHester84; Feb 28, 2010 at 09:10 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2010 | 04:21 AM
  #34  
norris_83's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Default

the truck drove great.. this is an all around cam i advise everyone to use for a starter cam... idle needs to be set around 700-750 though. thats the only flaw
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2010 | 09:09 AM
  #35  
LS1FREEK's Avatar
13 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 8
From: Sublette, KS
Default

Yeah, I have a similar cam in my truck and it made great power and is VERY daily drivable. After i dyno tuned it tho. Check out my signature. The cam feels doggy down low but its just cuz it pulls SO much harder up top. I think i lost very little down low over stock.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2010 | 04:16 PM
  #36  
norris_83's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Default

congrats on the final outcome LS1Freek! Might get a custom cam made up with your specs and see how it fairs on the newer trucks
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2010 | 05:05 PM
  #37  
LS1FREEK's Avatar
13 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 8
From: Sublette, KS
Default

Originally Posted by norris_83
congrats on the final outcome LS1Freek! Might get a custom cam made up with your specs and see how it fairs on the newer trucks
Thanks! Yeah I'm really happy. But most ppl don't think that my truck really made that much. It does sound a little high for an LM7 5.3, but thats what the dyno said. It may be off a little, but even at 20 hp its still impressive. But yeah, i love the cam! We never saw any knock retard with 28 deg timing, even when it was running lean. I'd definitely recommend it to any one with a 5.3
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2010 | 05:22 PM
  #38  
zipster's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
From: Joliet, Illinois
Default

Hey guys, sorry for the noob question, but when you are refering to the new 5.3 to the old 5.3 what designates old/new? I would guess the reluctor ring teeth, but I am not sure.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2010 | 06:58 PM
  #39  
sand man's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
From: Saudi Arabia
Default

on what octan did you tune Bader?
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2010 | 11:09 AM
  #40  
yurs78's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: Juda
Default

Originally Posted by zipster
Hey guys, sorry for the noob question, but when you are refering to the new 5.3 to the old 5.3 what designates old/new? I would guess the reluctor ring teeth, but I am not sure.
Read through the first 2 or 3 pages of this thread it will explain everything. The new 5.3 is pretty bad ***.
Welcome to the forum
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:50 PM.