Upgrading the 2004 work horse
04-23-2015, 09:17 PM
#24
I've only had 2 cams in my 6.0 aside from stock so not a huge sampling, however, my current 212/212 112 doesn't really feel any stronger down low than the 222/226 113 I had previously. And the larger cam had noticeable more pull up top I believe. The larger cam had more aggressive lobes though and I ended up busting a PAC beehive spring.
So if you really want to get more on the top end, you may want to step up to a low 220s cam. Zippy previously described the 212/218 in a 6.0 as like stock but more. A pretty similar powerband.
So if you really want to get more on the top end, you may want to step up to a low 220s cam. Zippy previously described the 212/218 in a 6.0 as like stock but more. A pretty similar powerband.
04-23-2015, 09:45 PM
#25
On The Tree
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
04-25-2015, 09:31 PM
#26
In-Zane Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 10,013
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If I was not doing so much, more cam options would be considered. But new head gaskets, the cost of a used 6 liter, headers, tune, valve springs, ect. All of these things are eating up too much funds so used is the option.