5.2 98 dakota vs 01 5.3 chevy

Old 01-22-2006, 09:28 PM
  #21  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Tool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

there's my competition. i should upload a pic of the Mopar.

1-1 for now hehe
Old 09-09-2007, 02:19 AM
  #22  
Teching In
 
chevynutss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tool
sorry i thought that they were all aluminum. what year did they make them all aluminum?
All 5.3's have cast iron blocks no matter what year...unless you get the HO 5.3 option. You could only get them on extended cab 4X4 trucks.
Old 09-09-2007, 08:48 AM
  #23  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (24)
 
RandomHero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Austin,TX Name:Mark
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by chevynutss
All 5.3's have cast iron blocks no matter what year...unless you get the HO 5.3 option. You could only get them on extended cab 4X4 trucks.
Wow. That's good to know. Hopefully they've figured this out over the last year and a half. THAT HOW OLD THIS POST IS
Old 02-03-2008, 12:46 PM
  #24  
Wearin' da big hat
iTrader: (10)
 
00ChevyScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Over There
Posts: 10,261
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

theres no way a ecsb silverado is ONLY 100 lbs heavier than an ecsb dakota...
Old 01-25-2009, 08:55 PM
  #25  
QLF
Launching!
 
QLF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Abbeville, LA
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 00ChevyScott
theres no way a ecsb silverado is ONLY 100 lbs heavier than an ecsb dakota...


That's what I was thinking. More like 500...
Old 01-25-2009, 10:17 PM
  #26  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
wastedrubber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

does this thread have a timer to pop up every year or so?
Old 01-26-2009, 07:20 AM
  #27  
TECH Resident
 
nighthawk08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by QLF
That's what I was thinking. More like 500...
i'd say more than that.

my ecsb 02 dakota was 3800 lbs.
Old 01-26-2009, 07:31 AM
  #28  
TECH Addict
 
95 bright teal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 2,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nice thread dig guys the OP hasnt been on the site for 3 years
Old 01-26-2009, 08:04 AM
  #29  
Wearin' da big hat
iTrader: (10)
 
00ChevyScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Over There
Posts: 10,261
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 95 bright teal
Nice thread dig guys the OP hasnt been on the site for 3 years
I wonder if he lost to that chevy yet.
Old 01-28-2009, 05:56 PM
  #30  
Teching In
 
Black5.9R/T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Columbia, Missouri
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by colyneedsv8
i'd say more than that.

my ecsb 02 dakota was 3800 lbs.

maybe my truck is fat and heavy then because i have weighed my standard cab R/T and it was 4788

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 5.2 98 dakota vs 01 5.3 chevy



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:32 PM.