Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Thoughts on Pat G spec'd cam for 5.3

Old 06-09-2016, 05:35 PM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
07NBSChevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default Thoughts on Pat G spec'd cam for 5.3

So I had Pat G spec a cam for Silverado. 2007.5 NNBS ECSB 4x4 with a LMG 5.3. I have 1-3/4"x3" Longtubes with Corsa Sport Catback, PRC Stage 1 ported 243 heads milled .010" to 63cc chambers, .045" Cometic head gaskets (Quench at .038"), PAC 1218's with PAC Titanium Retainers, Airaid Jr kit, Blackbear 91 tune, Rancho 4" lift, 4.56 gears on 305/70/17s (34x12). Truck weighs about 5500lbs and I tow 6500lbs often. I told him I want my shift points at 6k rpm with redline at 6200rpm, also told him I would like a cam with as much lowend torque as possible and a cam that I can use with the stock converter since I tow heavy often. It took him almost 3 weeks to get back with me with results so I did order elsewhere because I needed to get the truck back together. I went with a BTR stage 2 truck cam. His cam does seem a little large for my needs in my opinion.


But anyways what are your thoughts on his recommendation. 220/224 @.050, .578/.578 lift, 114+2 LSA ground on a CamMotion 8620 core with their lobes.
Old 06-09-2016, 08:04 PM
  #2  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Tim94gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mass.
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'm happy with the cam he spec'd for my GTO, but I'm not sure I would have him spec one for my truck.

I think the BTR cam will be better since you'll be towing often...
Old 06-09-2016, 08:14 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
gamble686's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

That cam choice is actually super good. The duration is mild with an exhaust favored split. The LSA will be smooth and power should come on nice and smooth shining best in the middle and upper rpms.
Old 06-09-2016, 11:32 PM
  #4  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
07NBSChevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I talked to BTR about his recommendation and they said it is larger than what I intend to use it for and it would be ideal to have a 2600-2800 stall converter with it, also would not be the best for towing that much weight. But that is what BTR said. I think I picked the better cam. I am not looking for a high RPM high HP cam. Just more usuable power under 6k rpm.
Old 06-10-2016, 12:16 AM
  #5  
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
Vortec350ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: South Shore, MA
Posts: 7,271
Received 61 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

I think something in between what you chose and what pat recommended would have been best. A 220 intake duration on a 112 ICL is kind of a lot in a 5.3.
Old 06-10-2016, 11:11 AM
  #6  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
07NBSChevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Ya, I originally had a Vinci Ultra Torque 210/218 .551/.551 116+2 cam and it had great power up to 6200rpm and made 415hp at 5700rpm and 409tq at 4700 rpm, but gave up to much lowend and would of been best with a 2600 stall since it didnt start pulling til 2500rpm or so. After researching the BTR truck stage 2 and seeing some dynos I quickly ordered the BTR.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Justhereforinfo
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
4
03-22-2016 12:41 PM
dkutej
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
8
03-20-2016 11:02 AM
LSOHOLIC
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
2
03-19-2016 02:27 PM
Mean87SS
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
2
03-18-2016 01:33 PM
JCunningham
GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion
2
03-17-2016 04:48 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Thoughts on Pat G spec'd cam for 5.3



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:11 PM.