Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Long rod 370?....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-26-2015, 12:23 PM
  #1  
Restricted
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
JordanH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: El Paso, Texas
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Long rod 370?....

I've got a set of forged Pistons for a 4" stroke and a 1.150 compression height. I was doing some figuring and I came up with two options; use some 4.8 genIV 6.275 rods and rebush them for a .927 pin size, or use a aftermarket 6.3 rod.. My math has the 4.8 6.275 rods right at 0 deck height with the 3.622 stroke and with the 6.3 rods and 3.622 the Pistons would be out of the hole .021.. Not sure how option two would work out? Maybe run a thicker head gasket? Anyways, I've never seen any builds use longer rods, besides the 4.8.. Most just seem to go for a longer stroke? What are the benefits to building a longer rod motor? From what I've read they seem to last longer and rev higher? Just curious as to why people choose bigger stroke and shorter rod combos over a factory 3.622 stroke and longer 6.3 rod setups?

I'm thinking about taking these extra parts I have laying around and building one just for the hell of it!
Piston compression height: 1.150
Option 1: 3.622 stroke, re-bushed 4.8 6.275 rods, and deck the block a hair
Option 2: 3.622 stroke, forged 6.3 rods, and run a thicker head gasket or mill a hair off the top of the Pistons?
Old 11-26-2015, 04:09 PM
  #2  
10 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (13)
 
RS/SS 4.8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: San Antonio Tx
Posts: 1,258
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Those are some interesing pistons you got there. Most of the ones ive seen use a 6.125 rod like mine.
Old 11-26-2015, 04:43 PM
  #3  
Restricted
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
JordanH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: El Paso, Texas
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Well, they're for a 408 build... But you can make up for the reduced stroke length with more rod length. I'm really liking the sound of this setup the more I read on it! Seems like the longer rod length you have the more rpm's you can turn and the actual motor will last longer! No piston rock, overall better piston stability, and longevity.
This setup also produces a very good rod ratio, 1.74!
Old 11-26-2015, 07:12 PM
  #4  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (26)
 
brandon6.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Glennville GA
Posts: 938
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I know guys destroke a 6.0 by installing a 4.8 crank and rods. I think it makes like 322ci. guys are pushing that combo pretty far with turbo setups. reving close to 8k I believe.

but will the 4.8 crank be able to be used with those pistons? I'm thinking u would want more cubes than less anyways.
Old 11-26-2015, 07:37 PM
  #5  
Restricted
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
JordanH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: El Paso, Texas
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by brandon6.0
I know guys destroke a 6.0 by installing a 4.8 crank and rods. I think it makes like 322ci. guys are pushing that combo pretty far with turbo setups. reving close to 8k I believe.

but will the 4.8 crank be able to be used with those pistons? I'm thinking u would want more cubes than less anyways.
On those destroked setups they run the factory Pistons, which have a 1.340 compression height. These pistol s I'm using are a 1.150 compression height. I'm basically taking a piston setup for a striker motor, 4.00 stroke, but using the stock 3.622 crank with them and making up for the difference in rod length. Basically the same as a 4.8, but doing it with a bigger cube motor.

Sticking with the stock 3.622 stroke crank.. It's going to be a 370ci, but with a 6.275-6.3 length rod.
I was really curious why people don't do this more often? There are many positive benefits to building a motor like this, broader longer power band, and a lot less stress on Pistons and cylinder walls..... From what I've been reading.

Last edited by JordanH; 11-26-2015 at 07:50 PM.
Old 11-27-2015, 01:22 AM
  #6  
8 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (32)
 
Blown06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,662
Received 39 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Option 2 sticks the piston out a little further than I would feel comfortable with. I've seen/done stuff at +.005 deck height but no more than that.

My opinion, get you a custom set of rods made. I like long rod **** myself.
Old 11-30-2015, 12:27 AM
  #7  
Restricted
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
JordanH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: El Paso, Texas
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Blown06
Option 2 sticks the piston out a little further than I would feel comfortable with. I've seen/done stuff at +.005 deck height but no more than that.

My opinion, get you a custom set of rods made. I like long rod **** myself.
Well, I got another 6.0 block, genIII. If the stuff doesn't sell in a week I'll be buying a set of forged h beam 6.250 rods and throwing it all together... I think it'll be a pretty good setup!
Old 11-30-2015, 09:32 AM
  #8  
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
Vortec350ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: South Shore, MA
Posts: 7,271
Received 61 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

I like the long rod stuff as well... but you gotta have the deck height for it. I hate that 4" stroke pistons have the pin in the oil ring land. Its one of many reasons why 408's burn oil.

I'd keep it a little more conventional. I went down this road with hoped of building a bullet proof mini stroker at 383 or 390ci but at the end of the day I couldn't get comfortable with it.
Old 11-30-2015, 10:38 AM
  #9  
Formerly ScreamingL
 
George C....'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: From the 412
Posts: 3,456
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

not all long rod combos work out so well, a 5.4 is a long rod and they bust rods very commonly since their rod is so long...Thats why you dont hear many of them turning rpms like a LS motor does
Old 11-30-2015, 02:20 PM
  #10  
Restricted
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
JordanH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: El Paso, Texas
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The Pistons are a 1.150 CH, so with the 3.622 stroke and a 6.250, or 4.8 6.275 rods I can be right at zero deck with a 1.73 rod ratio. If I use the 6.250 rods I'll have to deck the block a little, but these Pistons would be a perfect match for some 60-64cc heads. I'll just build it and sell it or save it for a 3rd gen truck build down the road!


Quick Reply: Long rod 370?....



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:43 AM.