Holley Hi-Rise vs Mid-Rise dyno results

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

01-06-2014, 08:29 PM

#21

03sierraslt

Admin

iTrader: (22)

Join Date: Jul 2004

Location: Western PA

Posts: 19,004

Likes: 23

Received 216 Likes on 172 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackGMC

I am working on letting it eat. Page up a little bit to the vag comment.

Ive seen it and Ive called you it, just didnt feel like beating a dead horse. Lol

Reply Like

01-06-2014, 08:31 PM

#22

jmgak47

TECH Enthusiast

iTrader: (3)

Join Date: May 2011

Location: Mt. Pleasant, Tx

Posts: 527

Likes: 1

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

I run the Hi-Ram because 454 cubes.

Interesting comparison though!

Reply Like

01-06-2014, 09:00 PM

#23

skeet

TECH Junkie

iTrader: (18)

Join Date: Feb 2007

Location: P.A. TX

Posts: 3,157

Likes: 0

Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

hey Corey once i get my super vic LS3 ( waiting on it ) with the 4500 flange my high ram will be for sale

if interested, (i'll give ya first dibs if interested ) it'll be a month or so

wanting to get back on the track in hopes of reproducing that 1.41 60 ft with the high ram on motor! this time with a transbrake. then a few passes with a small hit of nitrous ! probably be after the LS1 truck shootout

Reply Like

01-06-2014, 09:24 PM

#24

BlackGMC

Resident Retard

Thread Starter

iTrader: (31)

Join Date: Jan 2006

Location: Fort Worth - TX

Posts: 17,216

Likes: 14

Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts

I am in no rush. Hit me up once you get it off. Wait you run rectangular ports right? I am still using regular cathedral port heads.

Reply Like

01-06-2014, 09:59 PM

#25

skeet

TECH Junkie

iTrader: (18)

Join Date: Feb 2007

Location: P.A. TX

Posts: 3,157

Likes: 0

Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackGMC

I am in no rush. Hit me up once you get it off. Wait you run rectangular ports right? I am still using regular cathedral port heads.

yeah my bad didnt realize it until after i posted and didnt think to correct the post sorry!

Reply Like

01-06-2014, 10:03 PM

#26

BlackGMC

Resident Retard

Thread Starter

iTrader: (31)

Join Date: Jan 2006

Location: Fort Worth - TX

Posts: 17,216

Likes: 14

Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts

No worries man. Thanks for the offer and i will see you at the shootout.

Reply Like

01-06-2014, 10:19 PM

#27

oakley6575

TECH Senior Member

iTrader: (5)

Join Date: Dec 2010

Location: Las Vegas, NV

Posts: 5,235

Likes: 1

Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vortec350ss

I will say in quickly looking at the pics I am a little surprised. Whats different about the mid rise? To me it just looks like shorter runners. so I would have expected an opposite end result.

The mid rise is a dual plane intake vs the single plane hi rise.

Has anyone seen the mid rise intake without the top plate on? Its pretty cool looking

Reply Like

01-06-2014, 10:43 PM

#28

Vortec350ss

Moderator

iTrader: (20)

Join Date: Feb 2006

Location: South Shore, MA

Posts: 7,271

Likes: 24

Received 61 Likes on 60 Posts

Since it will make almost no effect while in boost why not choose the intake that will perform better while not in boost... My guess would be the mid rise with its stellar (in comparison) low end performance.