Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

5.3L LC9 vs 6.2L L94 dyno results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-04-2016, 08:36 PM
  #1  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
NicD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 5.3L LC9 vs 6.2L L94 dyno results

I can't leave anything alone so I decided to swap the 5.3L out of my 2010 Tahoe and replace it with a 6.2L L94 engine that I got from a local auto recycler. Now this comparison isn't apples to apples because the 5.3L was completely stock and when I swapped in the 6.2L I also did a cold air intake and 1 7/8" longtubes w/o cats. I kept the stock muffler because I wanted it to still be somewhat quiet so I'm sure that's hurting flow and there is room for improvement there but oh well. These dynos were done in very different weather conditions so keep in mind that while these are SAE corrected numbers it's not perfect. The 5.3L was dyno'd when it was 54 degrees outside with a 1.00 correction factor (basically none) and the 6.2L was dyno'd in 100 degree weather with a 1.07 correction factor. If these were dyno'd in the same conditions the 6.2L would have probably made a bit more power even with the SAE correction factor being applied. These pulls were also done in 3rd gear instead of 4th so keep in mind these numbers are going to be ~20-30 rwhp/rwtq low.



The interesting thing here is that in the midrange there are spots where it had an 85 ft/lb gain and at 6000 rpms it is up 93 rwhp! This is on 91 octane and is definitely octane limited. Anyways, just thought it was an interesting comparison. I only dropped about 1.5 mpg doing this swap in my normal daily driving stop and go commute too!
Old 08-05-2016, 02:23 AM
  #2  
8 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (32)
 
Blown06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,662
Received 39 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

I'd say thats a pretty legit comparison with minimal changes other than the engine and using correction factors for air quality. Nice gains. Bet it is much more fun to drive now. Did you keep the stock 6 speed auto that cam in the tahoe?

I've got a 2010 Texas Edition Tahoe with 65,000 miles on it that it absolutely pristine (cause my wife drives it). Probably never get rid of it. It has been a very nice SUV with the exception of the dash cracking 2 times now.
Old 08-05-2016, 03:36 AM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Wolftrk99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Virginia Beach,VA
Posts: 5,492
Received 36 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Damn, now i am really anxious to get my l92/6l80 swap in my yukon done.... May take it up and get it dynod before and after, just for shagrins!!
Old 08-05-2016, 08:46 AM
  #4  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Choda's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 2,782
Received 61 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

wow, thats a great upgrade. congrats on the swap.
Old 08-05-2016, 09:29 AM
  #5  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
NicD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Blown06
Bet it is much more fun to drive now. Did you keep the stock 6 speed auto that cam in the tahoe?

I've got a 2010 Texas Edition Tahoe with 65,000 miles on it that it absolutely pristine (cause my wife drives it). Probably never get rid of it. It has been a very nice SUV with the exception of the dash cracking 2 times now.
Yeah, it definitely is noticeable how much more go it has now. This is an ex-police tahoe and it has 122k miles on it and it's great with no issues. We will see how much longer the trans goes because it's just the stock 6L80 and while I firmed everything up in the tune it still has a bit more of a clutch pack wear lag then what I like to see.

Old 08-05-2016, 09:30 AM
  #6  
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
Vortec350ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: South Shore, MA
Posts: 7,271
Received 61 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Great info! Man that 6.2 really cranks compared to the 5.3.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Garrett12895
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
2
02-22-2016 10:42 AM
y2kls1truck
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
9
03-27-2005 01:13 AM
RandyZ71
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
1
03-31-2002 09:13 AM
primetime
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
4
02-15-2002 09:19 AM
CMNTMXR57
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
2
01-17-2002 09:14 AM



Quick Reply: 5.3L LC9 vs 6.2L L94 dyno results



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:55 PM.