Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

212/218 highlift cam with no stall?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-11-2015, 12:13 AM
  #11  
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (16)
 
stock48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Posts: 3,655
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

The stock converter is always a hard one as the stock cam could use a 3K converter. 6.0's do fend better tho. I've done some 210/216's , 532/.532, 108 and 110 lsa's that work well in stock converter 5.3~6.0 cc trucks. If it's a rc or ex cab you could stretch it out to the 214/216, .532/.532, 108 or go 110 lsa if you want a little smoother idle. Id stay away from anything wider than 112 lsa in a NA truck unless looking for a really smooth idle, or emissions.
Old 02-11-2015, 10:14 AM
  #12  
Moderator
iTrader: (19)
 
TXsilverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Humble Texas
Posts: 18,315
Received 220 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by batboy
I'm one of those guys that think the 212/218 is perfect for the 5.3, but too small for the 6.0.


depends on what you want to do...my 2500 HD crew cab on 33" tires is a heavy sluggish turd that I use as the work horse. 212/218 on a 110 LSA 106 ICL should improve my daily cruise and towing ability. i don't give a damn if i lose power past 4,000 rpm as long as i gain between 1,500-3,500 rpm.
Old 02-11-2015, 04:27 PM
  #13  
13 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (17)
 
726.0chevelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: baton rouge
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

A lot of people say a 212/218 is too small for a 6.0 which is not true maybe too small for the drag racer but it does produce good gains and pulls to 6000. It drives 100% like stock and has enough low end to blow the tires off with a stock converter. I think too small is the wrong word Id say more likely most would want to go bigger down the road. However op if your planning a stall and bigger cam later id step up a size or two now my lq4 ran just fine when i had 224 on 112 with a 4l60e stock converter with a mail order tune.
Old 02-11-2015, 06:01 PM
  #14  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
batboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: middle of nowhere, Kansas
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Some may have towing concerns and I get that, but generally the idea of a cam swap is to gain performance. The more cubes you have the more cam you can run. The 212/218 cam in a 6.0 is a baby cam. I have a 5.7 LS1 in my GTO and run a 230/236 cam. I make 300 torque by 1500 rpm. While I realize this is not an apples to oranges comparison, my point is don't be scared to put a modest size cam in a 6.0. The BTR truck stage III would get the nod if I had a 6.0 truck. Just my humble opinion.
Old 02-11-2015, 06:27 PM
  #15  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
GMCtrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 12,275
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

I ran the 222/226 113 lsa cam on my stock converter for several years, no problem.
Old 02-12-2015, 02:57 AM
  #16  
On The Tree
 
Fast_six oh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The tsp220 is a proven cam..makes great tq and some higher end hp..ive also had a few people recommend a lunati .217/.223 for my truck..as i im wanting a little bit of worlds but mainly TQ...i havent seen any dyno graphs with the lunati though
Old 02-23-2015, 07:42 AM
  #17  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
bluebommer07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: donaldsonville,la
Posts: 503
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I ran a 212 / 218 571.590 112 cam for 3 years in a 5.3 stock converter 3.73 gears stock manifolds and it pulled hard all around and did extremely well
Old 04-27-2015, 08:34 PM
  #18  
makes children cry
iTrader: (5)
 
_zebra's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: cold & windy
Posts: 2,704
Likes: 0
Received 399 Likes on 326 Posts
Default

i've been contemplating the Vinci Trucker or BTR Stage 3 for my RCSB (stock 5.3, 5speed, 4x4 with LTs/ORY, 4.30 gears, & 33"s). one of the guys at BTR actually suggested the Stage 2 instead since i occasionally tow.

at that point, though, wouldn't i be better off with the normal low lift Comp 212/218? either way, considering the 4.30s and manual trans (better gearing than a 4l60), wouldn't a 216/224 still be fine?

Originally Posted by batboy
You clearly don't realize the modding (or any cash spending) stops once you're married.
it don't stop... it just all gets spent on her
Old 04-27-2015, 09:13 PM
  #19  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
GMCtrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 12,275
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Anyone concerned about all around street power should check out the 6.0L hop up article from HotRod mag from years ago. They tested a multitude of cams in a 6.0L and the results were that the best all around cam was the Vinci 080 which is 210/218 if I recall correctly. It produced (by far) the most useable power off idle to 4800 rpm.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AHelm3
Dynamometer Results & Comparisons
3
04-08-2016 07:51 AM
Dirtywhite
TOWING & OFFROAD PERFORMANCE
2
08-05-2015 04:10 PM
Castro45
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
24
07-31-2015 07:13 PM
bizle
WTB (Wanted To Buy)
0
07-22-2015 07:31 PM
projectnightcrawler
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
5
07-19-2015 11:30 PM



Quick Reply: 212/218 highlift cam with no stall?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:25 PM.