Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

2000 5.3 Dyno 235k Miles and bolt-ons

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-19-2016, 04:51 AM
  #11  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 2,062
Received 55 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

I'd love to see some track times to go along with the dyno sheet. Not doubting the numbers, it's just nice to see both.
Old 10-19-2016, 05:17 AM
  #12  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
JohnDaMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sumter, SC
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Last time I went to Darlington it was 14.3 @ 95. That was before my tune
Old 10-19-2016, 09:16 AM
  #13  
On The Tree
 
Merctech2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 192
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Nice numbers and track times, man I got to get mine to the track.
Old 10-20-2016, 03:56 PM
  #14  
On The Tree
 
BlueTexan24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Weatherford, Texas
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I may have missed it, but is this a ecsb or a rcsb? That's a good et for those mods.
Old 10-20-2016, 04:16 PM
  #15  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
JohnDaMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sumter, SC
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

RCSB, no spare, roll pan
Old 10-21-2016, 08:14 AM
  #16  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
JohnDaMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sumter, SC
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The custom collector on my cheap stainless headers.





Old 10-21-2016, 05:18 PM
  #17  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
GM1697's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: in MA or SC
Posts: 1,568
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

thats pretty badass actually
Old 10-21-2016, 05:24 PM
  #18  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
JohnDaMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sumter, SC
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks man. That was a lot of time in research and work on those headers.
Old 10-21-2016, 08:54 PM
  #19  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Euless, TX
Posts: 614
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JohnDaMan
Are we talking about full throttle power or driving in general? The reason I ask is because this thread is titled dyno results of my 2000 Silverado.
Full throttle power and general driving. What I saw was a smoother power curve when the dyno software smoothing effect is reduced. Best way I can describe it is in speed density the power feels like it comes in waves, with the MAF on it is smoother overall. You can see far more dips and rises in speed density mode in the graph with less smoothing. I have even played with a MAF on a TBI 350 on one setup and it also ran much smoother on the MAF and made more average power. Throttle response is also noticeably better in my experience.

Last edited by Fast355; 10-21-2016 at 09:00 PM.
Old 10-22-2016, 07:43 AM
  #20  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
madmann26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Somewhere north of 285, south of 985.
Posts: 2,987
Received 371 Likes on 299 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fast355
Full throttle power and general driving. What I saw was a smoother power curve when the dyno software smoothing effect is reduced. Best way I can describe it is in speed density the power feels like it comes in waves, with the MAF on it is smoother overall. You can see far more dips and rises in speed density mode in the graph with less smoothing. I have even played with a MAF on a TBI 350 on one setup and it also ran much smoother on the MAF and made more average power. Throttle response is also noticeably better in my experience.
Just stop it. No one cares about you're TBI bullshit or your Express van.

Speed density has been proven time and time again.


Quick Reply: 2000 5.3 Dyno 235k Miles and bolt-ons



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:17 AM.