twin gt35 61/62 on 6.0, why is it better on 4.8?
11-01-2016, 06:53 PM
#21
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i had those turbos on my 4.8. i think my thread on ls1tech is what got you thinking about this.
those turbines are really small and the housings are .68
with a small cam it probably wouldnt be too bad on a 6.0 but you definitely wont be able to spin it up or make a lot of boost. but the power would be there.
those turbines are really small and the housings are .68
with a small cam it probably wouldnt be too bad on a 6.0 but you definitely wont be able to spin it up or make a lot of boost. but the power would be there.
but i think im just going to go with twin 70mm on3. .68
gt35 seems to be good but the once i found are below my goal hp.
saw this 700whp at 15psi is exactly what i want to around. its definitely an overshoot. but hopefully not too much lag.
Twin Turbo 1969 Camaro LQ4/T56 - LS1TECH
11-02-2016, 11:43 AM
#23
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
q trim are in the 69mm right?
I cant think of any low priced turbo that would have that spec.
unless you know of one thats in the 350 or less per turbo.
If my budget was a bit bigger then im sure ill find one that match what i need.
I cant think of any low priced turbo that would have that spec.
unless you know of one thats in the 350 or less per turbo.
If my budget was a bit bigger then im sure ill find one that match what i need.
12-10-2016, 06:36 AM
#27
