FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection

Direct port water meth injection

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-14-2017, 11:02 AM
  #11  
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
Vortec350ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: South Shore, MA
Posts: 7,271
Received 61 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

I agree with the thought of a single or dual nozzle as far from the ports as possible. With air traveling at that velocity with that much heat equal dispersion would be the last of my concerns.
Old 02-14-2017, 04:52 PM
  #12  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
 
MikeGyver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Suburban Chicago
Posts: 4,404
Received 191 Likes on 149 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thewrx
If that was the case then cars to run straight methanol wouldnt be able to run the amount of timing they do, and no intercooler if no cooling effect was present cause evaporation would still occurr imo.
I never said that port injection would give no cooling. And most of alcohol's ability to withstand more ignition advance in direct port injection comes from its octane rating of 110.
Old 02-14-2017, 04:54 PM
  #13  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
 
MikeGyver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Suburban Chicago
Posts: 4,404
Received 191 Likes on 149 Posts
Default

I guess I implied that it would give no cooling by saying that it would be for fueling only, sorry. I should have said mainly for fueling.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:06 PM.