FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection

Carnage pics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-23-2016, 01:01 PM
  #31  
Admin
iTrader: (22)
 
03sierraslt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Western PA
Posts: 19,004
Received 216 Likes on 172 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gadgetized
What should I get? I don't mind spending money on the right parts. I just put them in my Chevelle engine too.
I don't have all the answers, but I am going with Johnsons in mine.

Joseph, do you keep pretty woman clips handy? Or did you just memorize that movie?
Old 06-23-2016, 01:36 PM
  #32  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
 
BigKID's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Panama City, Fl
Posts: 4,836
Received 133 Likes on 88 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gadgetized
It isn't too bad. I didn't inspect it real well. We're your pistons .030? It would be a K444X3 wiseco.
Yes, Wiseco 4.030 -11cc circa 2007. Pn from invoice is K444H3, 6444H3 stamped on piston. I am not sure what the H vs X difference is. Maybe just an old part number.
Old 06-23-2016, 01:45 PM
  #33  
Custm2500's Rude Friend
iTrader: (17)
 
1FastBrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: JunkYard
Posts: 14,326
Received 759 Likes on 628 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 03sierraslt

Joseph, do you keep pretty woman clips handy? Or did you just memorize that movie?
Come on, who doesn't like a good hooker?
Old 06-23-2016, 02:24 PM
  #34  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Gadgetized's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 3,095
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BigKID
Yes, Wiseco 4.030 -11cc circa 2007. Pn from invoice is K444H3, 6444H3 stamped on piston. I am not sure what the H vs X difference is. Maybe just an old part number.
Text me pics
Old 06-23-2016, 06:54 PM
  #35  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
bigsapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: TX
Posts: 797
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Gadgetized
I would think if it was going to act up it would have happened at 22 PSI and 18.5 degrees of timing on 73% ethanol.
When was this in relation to what you've got going on now?

--------------------------

Actually skip all that.

It's possible you hurt the motor at some other point and it just picked now to come apart.
Old 06-23-2016, 08:12 PM
  #36  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
madmann26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Somewhere north of 285, south of 985.
Posts: 2,987
Received 371 Likes on 299 Posts
Default

I pm'd you Gadget.
Old 06-23-2016, 09:04 PM
  #37  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Gadgetized's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 3,095
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

If anyone was wondering the log showed 5766 RPM's, 15.5 PSI, 14.5 degrees of timing, and 11.4 AFR 97 degrees IAT.

Last edited by Gadgetized; 06-23-2016 at 09:23 PM.
Old 06-23-2016, 09:20 PM
  #38  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Gadgetized's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 3,095
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bigsapper
When was this in relation to what you've got going on now?

--------------------------

Actually skip all that.

It's possible you hurt the motor at some other point and it just picked now to come apart.
I did that last year I think in September. I drove the truck until the beginning of November. I rarely just cruise with it. When I drive it I get into the throttle pretty regularly. I parked it until about 1 month ago. I put my new turbo on it and started driving it. I was fairly easy on it, and progressively got into it. I was sort of surprised that I needed to remove fuel into boost. I thought this turbo would spool up much better at lower boost levels. Anyways I got into it a few time the day it let loose. I was about 30 minutes from home and rolled into it when it let loose. Ironically I was at the same place my 5 3 blew up. I guess that area is bad luck for me.
Old 06-23-2016, 10:09 PM
  #39  
TECH Enthusiast
 
07Softail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Ms. Sippie
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Coming from a Racing Background I would rather have a solid roller setup in these High HP builds being sprayed, boosted. Hydraulic lifters are slow at keeping the valve lifted on time. Now you will have much more valvetrain noise but it will also be more responsive at all RPM'S. IMO it looks like a lifter collapsed and the valve smacked the piston.

RT
Old 06-25-2016, 05:51 PM
  #40  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Gadgetized's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 3,095
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

The valves are REV valves and the exhaust is part number CL1169. The springs are visually fine. I haven't checked pressure. There is one nick in the cylinder that would be under where the top ring would ride. I can barely catch it with my finger. I think I will run it. I might even port up my stock 862's and give it hell. I had intended on a cam and stock rockers anyway. Still scratching my head about it.


Quick Reply: Carnage pics



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:21 PM.