FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection

Boost my 14 GMC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-11-2016, 10:15 PM
  #41  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Y2KLimited's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZO6Ted
Getting antsy...waiting for it to ship so I just ordered a Trucool 40k with cold weather bypass so it can go on at the same time. Come on FedEx!
I didn't use the bypass, just replaced the original. Takes a little longer to warm up but doesn't seem horrible, I'm just nice to the truck till its up to temp (which is hard because the cold air makes a ton of power)
Old 01-20-2016, 07:39 PM
  #42  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
ZO6Ted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 3,294
Received 252 Likes on 164 Posts
Default

I'm getting excited! 40K cooler showed up yesterday, Whipple delivers tomorrow. Cant wait to see the instructions & I'll decide if I do it in my driveway or schedule it with my mechanic buddy at his place. Hope I have time to get a before dyno although I'm not sure if it matters. Pretty much know what is normal for a 5.3 DI. 1/8 mile track times in a couple weeks. They run all winter around here.
Old 01-20-2016, 07:52 PM
  #43  
Resident Retard
iTrader: (31)
 
BlackGMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fort Worth - TX
Posts: 17,216
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Sweet. So why the whipple vs the maggie?
Old 01-20-2016, 09:22 PM
  #44  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
ZO6Ted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 3,294
Received 252 Likes on 164 Posts
Default

New Era thread a couple years ago on a 2012 5.3 with the Whipple really responded well... he liked them better than the Mag. The basic Mag kit just doesn't offer that much hp as it comes, gotta pulley down retune and so on. The fact that Maggie only offered a tuner kit for the 2300 was the main reason I guess bc its my daily. And I just didn't want the 1900 because I plan to go to a 6.2 DI in the next couple years and it was ~ same price. I sure would've liked the extra low end torque though so it was a very hard decision but I did save hundreds on a "complete" kit that supposedly put out 450whp on the stock pulley...we'll see. No wrong decision here lol.
Old 01-21-2016, 11:00 AM
  #45  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
madmann26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Somewhere north of 285, south of 985.
Posts: 2,987
Received 371 Likes on 299 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZO6Ted
New Era thread a couple years ago on a 2012 5.3 with the Whipple really responded well... he liked them better than the Mag. The basic Mag kit just doesn't offer that much hp as it comes, gotta pulley down retune and so on. The fact that Maggie only offered a tuner kit for the 2300 was the main reason I guess bc its my daily. And I just didn't want the 1900 because I plan to go to a 6.2 DI in the next couple years and it was ~ same price. I sure would've liked the extra low end torque though so it was a very hard decision but I did save hundreds on a "complete" kit that supposedly put out 450whp on the stock pulley...we'll see. No wrong decision here lol.
The place that is installing mine next month did the tuner kit (2300), their branded injectors, a Gen4 map sensor and then tuning.

Me being me, I've thought about adding a 2nd heat exchanger and pump. There is a low mount heat exchanger for the CTSV that looks like it would fit around the lower bumper area.

But I'm just toying with that idea right now.
Old 01-21-2016, 12:48 PM
  #46  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
ZO6Ted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 3,294
Received 252 Likes on 164 Posts
Default

Yours is gonna be a beast! I personally think the 2300 is a great choice and I'm still not sure why they only offered the 2900 on the later models. Not what I would've preferred. I'm reading through the manual now trying to comprehend all this crap...
Old 01-21-2016, 02:21 PM
  #47  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
madmann26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Somewhere north of 285, south of 985.
Posts: 2,987
Received 371 Likes on 299 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZO6Ted
Yours is gonna be a beast! I personally think the 2300 is a great choice and I'm still not sure why they only offered the 2900 on the later models. Not what I would've preferred. I'm reading through the manual now trying to comprehend all this crap...
Ted,

The larger displacement tops are interchangeable with the 2.3 lowers. I've got an email from Whipple on that.

Old 01-21-2016, 05:04 PM
  #48  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
ZO6Ted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 3,294
Received 252 Likes on 164 Posts
Default

I just wanted a turn key deal is why I got this one and its too late in the game for that now lol.
Old 01-21-2016, 06:52 PM
  #49  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
ZO6Ted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 3,294
Received 252 Likes on 164 Posts
Default

Don't guess I'll be seeing much belt slip...4.375 upper for 7.5 lbs.
Old 01-21-2016, 06:54 PM
  #50  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
madmann26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Somewhere north of 285, south of 985.
Posts: 2,987
Received 371 Likes on 299 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZO6Ted
Don't guess I'll be seeing much belt slip...4.375 upper for 7.5 lbs.
I'm shooting for around 13lbs.


Quick Reply: Boost my 14 GMC



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:56 AM.