FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection

5.3 mild and reliable?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-24-2015, 10:16 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Zizzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: San Juans, CO
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 5.3 mild and reliable?

This will not be a sexy build.

First some background:

I recently bought a 97 3500 express van nice and cheap. The high mileage 5.7 is disappointingly tired. Rather than dump money into that I'm thinking LM7 swap with turbo.

We live at 7000ft above sea level, and have to go over a 9,000ft pass quite often. Van is for carrying dirt bikes while towing a camper. Also to occassionally tow a car hauler with some other broken vehicle.

Not looking for huge HP numbers or a great deal of speed just some mild reliable HP. Ability to overtake uphill with a load when necessary. Good fuel economy when empty.

Hence I'm thinking no 6.0 or big block, just a 5.3 with a turbo to help feed it the thin air.

Just a few PSI to help it get back to sea level performance and a bit extra. A turbo that spools relatively low in the rev range.

Ideally no engine mods. The swap and plumbing will be a big enough project.

I have a lot of questions of course, but lets start with the premise.

Does this sound reasonable?

I have been trying to do my research.

Mounting the turbo something like this:

Turbo AWD full size van lives - LS1TECH

I have read this article:

594HP 5.3L Gen III Small Block for $3,252

Which says

With the 5.3 strapped to SAM's SuperFlow 902 engine dyno, our goal was to see how far we could push the stock long-block on 93-octane pump gas. For the baseline pulls, we set the wastegate at 8 psi of boost and dialed in a conservative 11.8:1 air/fuel ratio and 16 degrees of ignition timing. The wee 325ci mill responded with a respectable 532 hp at 5,300 rpm and 562 lb-ft of torque at 4,500 rpm.
So I was thinking 5-6 psi max.

It it as simple as piping a turbo to the 5.3?
Will the stock injectors be up to this? MAP sensor? MAF? Everything else?

Will a 5.3 PCM be up to the task with just a tune?
What sort of turbo should I be looking for that spools without too many revs?
Old 06-26-2015, 12:17 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
53bowtie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 1,614
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

I have no forced induction experience but here are my thoughts:

1) In your application there is no replacement for displacement. Do you think you will really get that great of an increase in gas mileage in a 1 ton van by going 5.3 instead of 6.0? What if you go 6.0 and can keep it out of boost 70% of the time where as the 5.3 has to be in boost a majority of the time due to load?
2) To size a turbo small enough to spool at low RPM means loaded or unloaded you will be in boost more times than not. There goes your mpg.....
3) Having the performance of a 5.3 at sea level would be hardly adequate in my eyes for a 1 ton van let alone hauling/towing anything on top of that.
4) If it were me I would go with a 6.0 and roots style blower. This will give you the best low range of any FI option which will allow you to haul/tow anything you wish. Plus, when the van is empty you might be able to keep it out of boost most of the time to get a bit better mpg, although, I hope your not building a 1 ton van hoping to get 18 in town and 20 on the highway.....

Just my thoughts, take them with a grain of salt as I have no personal experience with FI in a 1 ton van. Hopefully others will chime in with more experience......
Old 06-27-2015, 01:30 PM
  #3  
Teching In
 
JGTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

^ No forced induction experience huh?

With a turbo, you won't be "in boost" unless you want to be. You'll still run vacuum down the highway.

I think a turbo would be perfect for what you're wanting to do. Diesels pull like they do because they're turbocharged. A gas engine with a good turbo pulls really well too. Just be conservative with ignition timing and enjoy your new-found torque.

I'd definitely recommend injectors, a fuel pump, and tune (possibly 2 bar map as well, just depends on how you want to tune it).

Want hot intake temps coupled with high parasitic losses and crappy mileage? Go roots.

Want it to drive like stock until you hit a hill and need some more power? Go turbo.

FWIW, I drive a turbocharged 4 cylinder pickup. I've towed with it on occasion and it pulls really well. No more downshifting and screaming rpms, just lots of usable torque. Also, I gained a couple highway mpg after I installed the turbo.
Old 06-27-2015, 05:09 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
gamble686's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I think we are jumping ahead of ourselves a little bit. First I would suggest you handle the motor swap. A 6.0 is a significantly better starting point for a tow rig of your size. Handle all the details of that swap and then you can start worrying about FI. A turbo can be fun, but not as simple as a TVS kit. Either one will net you great results. Work out the motor swap details first. Then you can move on the the FI stuff. Save yourself some headache.
Old 07-07-2015, 04:49 AM
  #5  
Staging Lane
 
Show-n-go5.3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: New Brunswick, Canada
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Agreed, motor swaps are a big enough headache it self let alone the time it takes to tune a forced induction set up. One thing at a time. 5.3 with the right cam or a 6.0 will be a drastic improvement over that ol 5.7.
Old 08-10-2015, 10:10 PM
  #6  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Zizzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: San Juans, CO
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just to follow up: been busy doing this.

Accidentally ended up with a 4.8 instead of a 5.3.

Build thread:

https://www.performancetrucks.net/fo...-8-van-539084/

Thanks for the advice, I think JGTurbo was on the money.

I came across no 6.0 motors for sale around me. Searching wider I could find them but for more money than a turbo setup.

I'm pretty happy with how it turned out so far. We'll see how it holds up over time. But it's not being raced and will probably only do a couple thousand miles a year tops, so I'm optimistic.
Old 08-10-2015, 10:38 PM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kbracing96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Oakland, OR
Posts: 9,485
Received 30 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

<<< Turbo guy here, lol. 4.8 with BW S366 turbo will do wonders for towing and high elevation. ( I grew up in SE WY so no stranger to elevation )

Edit: I wrote this before I read your build and you did exactly what I would have done!! lol Nice job!

Last edited by kbracing96; 08-10-2015 at 10:44 PM.
Old 10-14-2015, 05:39 PM
  #8  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Zizzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: San Juans, CO
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 53bowtie
Plus, when the van is empty you might be able to keep it out of boost most of the time to get a bit better mpg, although, I hope your not building a 1 ton van hoping to get 18 in town and 20 on the highway.....
I did let this comment temper my fuel economy expectations a little. After all the van weighs 6,000+ lbs and has the aero of the side of a house.

But it does cruise at under 2000 rpm at the local speed limits (60mph).

A turbo won't necessarily affect cruising MPG. But I didn't really run the van NA after the 4.8 swap so I didn't have any baseline expectations.

As it's set up, it will build boost under load (uphill) at around 2500. When towing the load is obviously increased and it builds boost even lower. The real battle is that the trans wants to kick down when really is easily able to hold the higher gear -- more tuning needed there.

After getting the WOT fueling dialed in, I recently turned my attention to economy. My idle was too rich, and I eventually worked out my min injector pulse was too big. I'm used to manual trans, so I like engine braking -- I fiddled with DFCO to make it pretty aggressive.

I'm still fiddling with my engine tune - I can still add back a bit of timing I think.

But last trip into town empty I was indeed getting a bit over 20 MPG.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
5.3lSilverado
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
25
08-29-2016 12:48 AM
zachman078
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
13
09-21-2015 04:36 PM
03regcab sierra
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
2
09-09-2015 02:02 PM
FlowmasterMufflers
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
0
08-28-2015 10:58 AM
Chiphead
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
4
08-01-2015 04:43 PM



Quick Reply: 5.3 mild and reliable?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:00 PM.