2015 5.3 Silverado Build (blower/cam) pics/video
#22
Teching In
Thread Starter
a shop did the cam swap and they did not drop the oil pan. it was a 2 day job
#24
Teching In
Thread Starter
#26
Teching In
Thread Starter
You are welcome. Any feedback on why you prefer the single valve springs compared to duals?
#27
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (8)
I will only go dual from now on
KB: my logic to go single was I didnt want a heavy noisy high pressure springs beating up cam,valve seats,cam bearings.
Last edited by gonzo 6.2; 07-26-2016 at 11:41 PM.
#28
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tinker till it blows, then back it off a notch, maybe!!
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1) cost
2) not planning on revving past 6k ish
3) ease of install.....supposed to be a drop in replacement (on an ls anyways)
4) a bunch of the ls guys making way more boost have run these for a long time
5) seat pressure as compared to duals....lower = less wear and tear
I was told that these were approx. cam specs
L83 .500/.490 lift
L86 .550/.550
LT4 .490/.551 120 lsa
#29
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tinker till it blows, then back it off a notch, maybe!!
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I learned my lesson,brian tooley sold me pac 1211x springs for my boosted 010 6.2 with LS9 cam 1 sum bitch took a dump after about 20k mile.1 head 1 piston later it was good again
I will only go dual from now on
KB: my logic to go single was I didnt want a heavy noisy high pressure springs beating up cam,valve seats,cam bearings.
I will only go dual from now on
KB: my logic to go single was I didnt want a heavy noisy high pressure springs beating up cam,valve seats,cam bearings.
Cost is a restraint on this project.....built engine would be another story
any details on your Silverado?
fwi: I don't see the 1211's listed on the pac site anymore?