Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Graphs | Power Comparisons | Dyno Truck List

curious on numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-07-2014, 09:08 AM
  #11  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Euless, TX
Posts: 614
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Funkster
Not likely. I made 242whp/29xwtrq on a stock 5.3L. I would be very surprised to see a 100whp gain from a small cam and long tubes.
My Hemi did it, gained nearly exactly 100 RWHP @ 6,200 rpm, peak to peak was around 60 HP. Went from 285 to 345 HP, then opened up the exhaust, used a short belt to bypass the p/s and a/c compressor, and ran E-85 and put down 385 RWHP.
Old 05-07-2014, 12:51 PM
  #12  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (97)
 
Funkster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Urbandale, Iowa
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ZO6Ted
There is a Nelson project on LS1truck that did exactly that. 100RWHP. Check it out.
Originally Posted by Fast355
My Hemi did it, gained nearly exactly 100 RWHP @ 6,200 rpm, peak to peak was around 60 HP. Went from 285 to 345 HP, then opened up the exhaust, used a short belt to bypass the p/s and a/c compressor, and ran E-85 and put down 385 RWHP.
I didn't say not possible.

However, the OP is asking about a peak to peak situation it seems. Also we are not talking about a Hemi, apples to oranges.
Old 05-07-2014, 02:47 PM
  #13  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Euless, TX
Posts: 614
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Funkster
I didn't say not possible.

However, the OP is asking about a peak to peak situation it seems. Also we are not talking about a Hemi, apples to oranges.
Its not nearly as apples to oranges as you would think.

The engines have many design similarities, very close to the same head flow and valve size, and the intake designs are similar. The factory cams have very similar specs to the stock 5.3. Not to mention Comp Cams uses the lobes they designed for the LS1 for the modern Hemi. More similarities than differences.
Old 05-07-2014, 04:09 PM
  #14  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
calboi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

^who'd thunk it
Old 05-08-2014, 08:15 AM
  #15  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (97)
 
Funkster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Urbandale, Iowa
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Fast355
Its not nearly as apples to oranges as you would think.

The engines have many design similarities, very close to the same head flow and valve size, and the intake designs are similar. The factory cams have very similar specs to the stock 5.3. Not to mention Comp Cams uses the lobes they designed for the LS1 for the modern Hemi. More similarities than differences.
Well, I have to say I don't think a design concept being similar on an engine with different displacement makes it directly apples to apples, but we are all entitled to opinions.

This still doesn't change the fact that 60hp peak to peak is not 100hp peak to peak. There may be areas in the RPM range where the truck makes an increase of 100rwhp. However, I have a hard time believing it is common place enough for a person to make 350rwhp with a baby cam on a 5.3 that we should be leading the OP to expect it to happen.
Old 05-08-2014, 08:31 AM
  #16  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
calboi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

we can let this thread go now i ordered 243 heads with pac springs and bigger cam yesterday so....
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nabozny21
FORCED INDUCTION
6
10-17-2015 07:47 PM
03sierraslt
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
14
10-09-2015 05:53 AM
KleanKustoms
FORCED INDUCTION
1
09-30-2015 05:07 PM
Slammed silverado
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
3
09-28-2015 06:14 PM



Quick Reply: curious on numbers



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:39 PM.