Notices
8-Lug Truck Performance Duramax, 8.1L, and HD tech | Intakes | Exhaust | Tuning | Suspension | Drivetrain

2005 LQ4 2500HD upgrade or downgrade ?

Old 03-28-2016, 07:43 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Alco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 2005 LQ4 2500HD upgrade or downgrade ?

I use to own an Avalanche 2500 8.1L and loved the truck so I'm thinking of selling my lowered '02 RCSB RWD lm7 1500 to go for a ECSB 4x4 LQ4 2500HD. I love my RCSB and the power is decent for a little truck but I can't bring the wife and kids for a ride and with the harsh winter ( and sketchy driveway) the truck stays inside all winter and use my Subaru!

I like the looks of a HD, need the 4x4 and the towing capacity ( Race car hauler), the 4L80E and 14 bolt is an added bonus !
Will a Gas 6.0L 2500hd be a big turd ?
Will a LSA blower and LS3/L92 heads do any good to the truck?
What about gas millage with the blower ?
Any weak point to look for ( that are different than the 1500 I already have)?

Any good advice is appreciated !
Old 03-28-2016, 07:52 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
GMCtrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 12,275
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Given that you already had the 8.1, I'd try and find another 8.1 vehicle. The 6.0 will probably be underwhelming in comparison and everyone I've seen on here that tries to mod a 6.0 HD for towing ends up regretting it.
Old 04-26-2016, 08:32 PM
  #3  
Banned
 
Wolfe Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Having had both, I can attest to the fact that overall you will probably miss the 8.1 for towing. I had an 01 2500HD with 8.1/Alli combo, and only now that my 07.5 with a 6.0 has a S/C running 9psi through an LSA is it comparable.

The transmission is a huge consideration as well. If you take a 6.0 in the 99-06 range and put an S/C on it, you'll be close in power but still have an inferior transmission. The 6 speed in the newer body style has been great... don't really miss the Allison with this one.

Not to mention, the MPG out of an 8.1 was surprisingly good - better when towing than my S/C'd 6.0.
Old 04-26-2016, 11:02 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Wolftrk99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Virginia Beach,VA
Posts: 5,492
Received 36 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

The 8.1 avalnches got ridiculously good fuel mileage.... I had one and kick myself everytime i see another avi.... Went to an 8.1 dually with an allison and 4.56 and about killed myself trying to pay for the truck and the fuel, would pull anything in 4lo, but mpg was not worth it....
Old 05-01-2016, 09:15 PM
  #5  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
zraffz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I like my 2005 2500HD (6.0 4L80E 4WD 4.10 gears) SCLB. It gets 12 mpg local driving. I bought it to pull a small landscape trailer and 48" bobcat zero turn mower to mow a few lawns after work.

I plan on using it to tow my street/strip S10 to the track. I've towed with a few 6 liter trucks, the 4 speed is defiantly a slug compared to the newer 6 speeds; I'd say the 6.0/4 speed is pretty comparable to the 5.3/6 speed towing from my experiences.
Old 05-07-2016, 06:35 PM
  #6  
TECH Regular
 
flatblack83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 406
Received 25 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

I know my 03 2500hd lifted on 37s with 513 gears tows an 8k trailer pretty nice, now tho with the magnuson 1900 it does real well. Not the greatest on gas but it runs great.
Old 08-05-2016, 02:03 PM
  #7  
Staging Lane
 
ullose272's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Meridian ID
Posts: 76
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wolfe Performance
Having had both, I can attest to the fact that overall you will probably miss the 8.1 for towing. I had an 01 2500HD with 8.1/Alli combo, and only now that my 07.5 with a 6.0 has a S/C running 9psi through an LSA is it comparable.

The transmission is a huge consideration as well. If you take a 6.0 in the 99-06 range and put an S/C on it, you'll be close in power but still have an inferior transmission. The 6 speed in the newer body style has been great... don't really miss the Allison with this one.

Not to mention, the MPG out of an 8.1 was surprisingly good - better when towing than my S/C'd 6.0.
the trans in the 99-06 is a 4l80e and is hardly inferior, it doesnt have the gearing but its a stout tranny in stock form and even better with a kit.
Old 08-17-2016, 11:47 AM
  #8  
TECH Regular
 
DarkCharisma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

no matter which way you cut it, the LQ4 is going to be down on power compared to the 8.1. One less forward gear in the 80e over the Allison, too.

The 6.0L is a fine puller, but I can't imagine you'll be satisfied after having the big block for so long.

FWIW I have pulled over 10k with my LQ4 and it's fine, just takes a bit to climb hills and you have to be willing to let it spin.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
booboo37
GM Parts Classifieds
2
03-04-2016 07:54 PM
ROGERZ
New Members
8
02-26-2016 06:30 PM
Dwalton93
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
0
02-09-2016 10:27 AM
vipergtrdj
TOWING & OFFROAD PERFORMANCE
2
02-08-2016 05:24 PM
Rrodriguez13
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
6
02-04-2016 02:00 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 2005 LQ4 2500HD upgrade or downgrade ?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:22 PM.